THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -EXEMPTION vs. THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA

PDF · subscribers
ITA/600/2018HC DelhiDLHC01113410201821 May 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that no question of law arises for consideration. The Court's reasoning is based on the fact that both the CIT(A) and the ITAT had concurrently ruled in favour of the assessee regarding the claim for benefit under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. Furthermore, the Court had previously upheld the same benefit for the assessee for an earlier assessment year in ITA 807/2016. Given this precedent and the concurrent findings of the lower authorities, the Court found no substantial question of law to be decided. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The appellant is the Commissioner of Income Tax - Exemption, and the respondent is The National Rifle Association of India. The appeal is against the concurrent orders of the CIT(A) and the ITAT, which ruled in favour of the assessee. The dispute concerns the assessee's claim for benefit under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The High Court notes that for a previous assessment year, it had upheld the benefit of Section 2(15) read with Section 12A of the Act in a prior appeal (ITA 807/2016). The current appeal challenges the same benefit for the assessment year under consideration.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the assessee could claim the benefit under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue contended that the assessee was not entitled to the benefit under Section 2(15). The judgment does not record specific arguments from the assessee's side, but it notes that the CIT(A) and the ITAT had concurrently ruled in favour of the assessee on this issue. The Revenue's grievance is that the assessee could not have claimed the benefit under Section 2(15). The Court also references a previous decision where it upheld the benefit of Section 2(15) read with Section 12A of the Act for the National Rifle Association of India.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(15),Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 600/2018

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -EXEMPTION ..... Appellant

Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. for Revenue.

versus

THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA .... Respondent

Through

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R %

21.05.2018

The Revenue’s grievance is that the assessee could not have claimed the benefit under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) and the ITAT concurrently ruled in favour of the assessee; furthermore for the previous assessment year this Court upheld the benefit of Section 2(15) read with Section 12A of the Act (ITA 807/2016, Commissioner of Income Tax vs. National Rifle Association of India).

As a result, no question of law arises for consideration. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

A. K. CHAWLA, J MAY 21, 2018 ‘dc’

More judgments on Section 2(15)

All 2,878 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(15) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →