COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S CAPITAL FLOUR MILLS P.LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the view taken by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which was the subject matter of ITA No. 112/2006, could not be faulted. Consequently, the High Court found no merit in the present appeal filed by the Revenue. The reasoning was based on the prior decision in ITA No. 112/2006, where the Tribunal's view was deemed correct. The ratio decidendi is that if a Tribunal's finding on a matter is legally sound and cannot be faulted, an appeal against it lacks merit. No substantial question of law arose for consideration. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal.
What were the facts?
The appeal before the High Court of Delhi was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I, against M/s. Capital Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. The assessment year(s) are not explicitly stated. The appeal is consequential to and dependent upon the decision in ITA No. 112/2006, which also involved the same parties. The High Court reviewed the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that was the subject of ITA No. 112/2006. The amount in dispute is not specified. The procedural history involves an appeal filed by the revenue against the ITAT's order.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's view, as considered in ITA No. 112/2006, can be faulted with. This is a question of law. The appellant (Revenue) implicitly argues that the Tribunal's view was incorrect and therefore the appeal should be allowed. The respondent (Assessee) implicitly argues that the Tribunal's view was correct and therefore the appeal should be dismissed. The judgment does not explicitly detail the arguments of either side or name any specific authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon, other than referencing the prior decision in ITA No. 112/2006.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI
+ ITA No. 206 of 2006
Judgment reserved on: July 10, 2007 % Judgment delivered on: July 25, 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-I, New Delhi. ...Appellant Through Mr. J.R. Goel, Advocate
Versus M/s. Capital Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. B-28, Lawrence Road, Industrial Area Delhi-110035. ...Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sapra, Advocate Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Not necessary 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Not necessary ITA No.206/2006 Page 1 of 2
MADAN B. LOKUR, J. This appeal is consequential to and dependant upon the decision in ITA No.112/2006 (Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Capital Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd.). 2. Since we find that the view taken by the Tribunal, which is the subject matter of ITA No.112/2006, cannot be faulted with, there is no merit in this appeal. 3. No substantial question of law arises for consideration. Dismissed. Madan B. Lokur, J
July 25, 2007 V.B. Gupta, J ncg Certified that the corrected copy of the judgment has been transmitted in the main Server. ITA No.206/2006 Page 2 of 2
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Bamaniya vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary Ministry Of Home AffairsMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Patidar vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Lokesh vs. Bank Of Maharashtra Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Arvind Lunawat vs. Axis Bank LimitedMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
