PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-2) vs. TANVIR FINANCE AND LEASING LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The Delhi High Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, disposing of the application for condonation of delay. Subsequently, in view of its own decision dated 27th July 2015 in ITA No. 510 of 2015 [Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-II) v. Aakash Arogya Mandir Pvt. Ltd.], the High Court dismissed the present appeal. The reasoning for dismissing the appeal is based on the precedent set in the Aakash Arogya Mandir Pvt. Ltd. case, implying that the issue in the present appeal was covered by that earlier ruling. The specific issue decided in the precedent case and its ratio decidendi are not detailed in this judgment. No specific operative directions were issued other than the dismissal of the appeal. No issues were expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-2), filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The respondent is Tanvir Finance and Leasing Ltd. The appeal was filed with a delay, for which a condonation application was made. The High Court was to decide on the merits of the appeal, which stemmed from an ITAT order concerning assessment year(s) not specified in the judgment. The amount in dispute is also not recorded. The procedural history involves the filing of the appeal by the revenue and the subsequent condonation of delay.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned? (Procedural question) 2. Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue against the ITAT's order has merits? (Substantive question) Assessee's Contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee, Tanvir Finance and Leasing Ltd. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue, represented by Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Senior Standing Counsel, and Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior Standing Counsel, sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The Revenue's substantive arguments on the appeal's merits are not detailed in the judgment, but the appeal itself was filed against an ITAT order.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 8. +
ITA 16/2016
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX (CENTRAL-2)
.... Appellant
Through: Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Senior Standing
counsel and Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior
Standing counsel , Ms. Radhika Gupta, Advocate.
versus
TANVIR FINANCE AND LEASING LTD ..... Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
06.01.2016 O R D E R
CM APPL No. 340 of 2016(for condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
The application is disposed of.
ITA No. 16 of 2016 3. In view of the decision dated 27th July 2015 passed by this Court in ITA No. 510 of 2015 [Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-II) v. Aakash
Arogya Mandir Pvt. Ltd.] the appeal is dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J JANUARY 06, 2016 mg
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
