THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-EXEMPTION vs. APPAREL EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the issues raised by the Revenue in the present appeal for assessment year 2011-2012 were indeed covered by its earlier decision in ITA No. 808/2016, dated November 22, 2016. Consequently, the Court found that no substantial question of law arose for its consideration. The appeal was accordingly dismissed. The specific findings or reasoning from the prior decision that covered these issues were not detailed in this judgment, nor were any operative directions issued beyond dismissing the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue, represented by the Commissioner of Income Tax-Exemption, filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court against an order concerning the Apparel Export Promotion Council for the assessment year 2011-2012. The Revenue also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, which was allowed unopposed. The High Court noted that the issues raised in the present appeal were covered by a previous decision of the same court in ITA No. 808/2016, dated November 22, 2016.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the issues raised by the Revenue in its appeal for assessment year 2011-2012 are covered by the High Court's prior decision in ITA No. 808/2016 dated November 22, 2016? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: Not recorded. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue argued that the issues in the present appeal were covered by the previous decision of the High Court in ITA No. 808/2016. No specific authorities or precedents were mentioned.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 1119/2018
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- EXEMPTION
....... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate
versus
APPAREL EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Kavita Jha with Mr. Udit
Naresh, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R %
09.10.2018
CM APPL. No. 42117/2018
This is an application seeking condonation of delay. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, as there is no opposition to the same. ITA No. 1119/2018 The issues raised by the respondent in this appeal which pertains to the assessment year 2011-2012 is covered against it by the decision dated 22nd November, 2016 passed in ITA No. 808/2016. In view of the aforesaid position, no substantial question of law arises for consideration of this Court and the appeal is dismissed.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J OCTOBER 09, 2018/P
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026