PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 vs. NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. (FOREMERLY KNOWN AS, NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS PVT. OLTD.)

PDF · subscribers
ITA/1025/2017HC DelhiDLHC01431722201721 November 2017Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the issue of granting an extension of stay by the ITAT was no longer res integra, citing the decision in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (2015) 376 ITR 87 (Del.). Based on this precedent, the High Court found no reason to interfere with the ITAT's order. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal. No specific issue was left undecided.

What were the facts?

The Revenue, represented by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6, filed an appeal before the High Court of Delhi challenging an order dated March 3, 2017, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT's order had granted an extension of stay to the assessee, Nokia Solutions & Networks India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Nokia Siemens Networks Pvt. Ltd.). The appeal was filed with a delay, for which the Revenue sought condonation. The High Court considered the application for condonation of delay and the main appeal.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the ITAT was justified in granting an extension of stay to the assessee. The Revenue contended that the issue was no longer res integra, implying a settled legal position that might preclude the ITAT's order. The Revenue relied on the decision in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (2015) 376 ITR 87 (Del.) to support its argument. The assessee's specific arguments or contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The question before the High Court was essentially whether to uphold the ITAT's order granting the extension of stay.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 1025/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Akriti Dewan, Adv. versus NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. (FOREMERLY KNOWN AS, NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS PVT. OLTD.) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra and Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 21.11.2017 CM No. 42225/2017 (condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal) For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned. The applications stand disposed of. ITA 1025/2017 The Revenue Appellant impugns the order dated 03.03.2017 passed by the ITAT granting extension of stay. The issue is no longer res integra in terms of the decision in “Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (2015) 376 ITR 87 (Del.). The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 21, 2017/‘rs’

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →