CIT vs. KRBL LTD

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 90 / 2011HC Delhi25 January 20111 pages
For Petitioner: SANJEEV SABHARWAL
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the assessment orders were passed by the Assessing Officer based on orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had previously quashed these Section 263 orders. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the assessment orders, finding no basis for them to survive. The High Court, following its own prior order dated November 30, 2010, in ITA No. 1860/2010, which dealt with an identical issue for the same assessee, dismissed the present appeals. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeals, and all pending applications were also disposed of.

What were the facts?

The appeals before the High Court of Delhi concern the assessee and the Revenue. The assessment orders under challenge were passed by the Assessing Officer based on orders issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had previously quashed the CIT's orders under Section 263. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the assessment orders, finding no basis for them to survive. The Revenue had filed an earlier appeal, ITA No. 1860/2010, on an identical issue concerning the same assessee, which was dismissed by the High Court on November 30, 2010. The present appeals, ITA No. 90/2011, ITA No. 96/2011, and ITA No. 97/2011, were also dismissed by the High Court following the precedent set by the earlier dismissal.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer are valid when the basis for these orders, namely the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, have been quashed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The assessee would argue that once the orders of the CIT under Section 263 are quashed, the assessment orders passed pursuant to them lose their foundation and must be set aside. The ITAT's decision to set aside the assessment orders is therefore correct. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue would contend that the High Court should uphold the assessment orders, possibly by arguing that the ITAT erred in quashing the CIT's orders or that there were independent grounds to sustain the assessment orders. However, the judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the Revenue in these appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . 25.01.2011 . Present: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate for the appellant. Ms.Bhakti Pasrija, Advocate for the respondent. . (Common Order) +ITA No.90/2011 ITA No.96/2011 and CM Appl. No.789/2011 ITA No.97/2011 and CM Appl. No.790/2011 . . Identical issue pertaining to this very assessee was raised by the Revenue in ITA No.1860/2010, which appeal was dismissed vide order dated November 30, 2010. It would suffice to note that order, which became the subject matter of the appeal, was passed by the Assessing Officer on the basis of the orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act (for short ?the Act?). The said order of the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Act got itself quashed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Thus, no basis for passing the assessment order survives and, in these circumstances, the Tribunal, by the impugned order, has set aside the assessment order. Following order dated 30th November, 2010 passed in ITA No.1860/2010, we dismiss these appeals. All the pending applications are also disposed of. . A.K. SIKRI, J. . . . . . JANUARY 25, 2011 M.L. MEHTA, J. Dev #13

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →