COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S KRISHNA CONTINENTAL LTD.

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 68 / 2006HC Delhi20 January 20061 pages
For Petitioner: P.L.BANSAL,VISHNU SHARMA
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Delhi admitted the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) and formulated a substantial question of law. The question posed is whether the ITAT was legally correct in its determination that the Tourism Finance Corporation of India falls under the exemption provided by Section 194A(3)(iii)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This exemption, if applicable, would relieve the assessee, M/s Krishna Continental Ltd., from the obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 194A. The High Court has not yet decided on the merits of this question, as the appeal has only been admitted for hearing. No finding has been made on the issue, and no operative directions have been issued beyond admitting the appeal and posting it for hearing. The specific reasoning of the ITAT leading to its conclusion is not detailed in this excerpt, nor is the ratio decidendi of the High Court's eventual decision.

What were the facts?

This case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The respondent is M/s Krishna Continental Ltd. The appeal concerns the assessment year(s) not explicitly stated in this excerpt. The core issue revolves around the ITAT's decision that the Tourism Finance Corporation of India is covered by Section 194A(3)(iii)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the ITAT held that the assessee, Krishna Continental Ltd., was not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194A of the Act. The High Court of Delhi admitted the appeal and formulated a substantial question of law.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the ITAT was correct in law in holding that the Tourism Finance Corporation of India is covered by the provisions of Section 194A(3)(iii)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and that the assessee was not for that reason liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194A of the Act? (Question of law). The appellant (Commissioner of Income Tax) contends that the ITAT erred in its interpretation of Section 194A(3)(iii)(b) and its applicability to the Tourism Finance Corporation of India. The appellant argues that the assessee was indeed liable to deduct tax at source. The respondent (M/s Krishna Continental Ltd.) did not present any arguments before the High Court as 'None' appeared for them. The judgment does not record any specific authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon by either party in this excerpt.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 194A,Section 194A(3)(iii)(b)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . ITA 68/2006 . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS ..... Appellant Through : Ms.P.L. Bansal, Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Advs. versus . M/S KRISHNA CONTINENTAL LTD. ..... Respondent Through : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.CHATURVEDI . O R D E R 20.01.2006 CM No. 435/2006 Heard. Allowed subject to just exceptions. ITA No. 68/2006 ADMIT. The following substantial question of law is formulated for determination : ?Whether ITAT was correct in law in holding that the Tourism Finance Corp. of India is covered by the provisions of Section 194A(3)(iii)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and that the assessee was not for that reason liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194A of the Act?? The appellant shall file the requisite number of paper books in accordance with the High Court Rules. Post for hearing at its turn. . T.S. THAKUR, J . B.N.CHATURVEDI, J JANUARY 20, 2006 pk.

More judgments on Section 194A

All 1,500 judgments and leading authorities on Section 194A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →