COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-X vs. ATUL GUPTA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Delhi decided to admit the appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-X. It issued notice to the respondent, Atul Gupta, which was accepted by his counsel. The applications for condonation of delay were allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The court did not delve into the substantive issues of the appeals at this stage. The operative direction was to renotify the matters for further proceedings on July 2, 2013. No specific findings on the merits of the case were made, and no issues were left undecided as the appeals were admitted for hearing.
What were the facts?
The appeals (ITA 56/2013 to ITA 60/2013) were filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-X (appellant) against the respondent, Atul Gupta. The appeals were admitted by the High Court of Delhi, which issued notice to the respondent. Notice was accepted by the respondent's counsel. The matters were renotified for a later date. The applications for condonation of delay (CM 1942/2013 to CM 1945/2013) were allowed subject to all just exceptions. The judgment does not specify the assessment years, the specific orders or actions under challenge, the authority that passed them, or the amount in dispute.
What were the issues?
The High Court of Delhi was to decide whether to admit the appeals filed by the Revenue. The Revenue (appellant) sought to challenge certain orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The respondent, Atul Gupta, was represented and accepted notice. The judgment does not record specific arguments from either side regarding the merits of the appeals, as the primary focus of this order is procedural admission and issuance of notice. The questions of law, if any, that the appeals would eventually address are not detailed in this specific order.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . . . ITA 56/2013, ITA 57/2013, ITA 58/2013, ITA 59/2013 and ITA 60/2013 . . . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-X ..... Appellant . Through : Mr N. P. Sahni with Mr Ruchesh Sinha . . . versus . . . ATUL GUPTA ..... Respondent . Through : Mr Salil Aggarwal . . . CORAM: . HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED . HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR . . . O R D E R . 18.02.2013 . CM 1942/2013 in ITA 56/2013, ITA 57/2013, CM 1943/2013 in ITA 58/2013, CM 1944/2013 in ITA 59/2013 and CM 1945/2013 in ITA 60/2013 . . . Allowed subject to all just exceptions. . ITA 56/2013, ITA 57/2013, ITA 58/2013, ITA 59/2013 and ITA 60/2013 . . . Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Mr Aggarwal on behalf of the respondent. . Renotify on 02.07.2013. . BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J . . . . . . . R.V.EASWAR, J . FEBRUARY 18, 2013 . SR . . . $ 62 .
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026