COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. DLF LTD. (EARLIER DLF UNIVERSAL LTD.)
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court condoned the delay of 289 days in refiling the appeal, finding that sufficient cause existed for the delay. The Court ordered that the application for condonation of delay be disposed of. The substantive appeal (ITA 431/2010) was not decided on its merits. Instead, it was directed to be listed on September 30, 2010, along with two other related appeals (ITA No.159/2010 and ITA No.408/2009) before a specific bench. No finding was reached on the core issues of the appeal, and no operative directions were issued regarding the assessment.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) filed an appeal before the High Court of Delhi against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeal, numbered ITA 431/2010, was filed by DLF Ltd. (Assessee). The Revenue sought condonation of a delay of 289 days in refiling the appeal. The High Court heard both parties and found sufficient cause for the delay, ordering its condonation. The appeal itself was then adjourned to be listed on September 30, 2010, along with two other related appeals, ITA No.159/2010 and ITA No.408/2009.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court should condone the delay of 289 days in refiling the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Revenue argued that sufficient cause existed for the delay. The Assessee did not record any specific argument against condonation in the provided text. 2. The substantive issues of the appeal itself were not addressed as the appeal was adjourned. The judgment does not record any specific questions of law or fact that the Tribunal had to decide, nor does it detail the arguments of either side on the merits of the appeal. The only procedural matter discussed was the condonation of delay.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . . ITA 431/2010 . . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Adv. . versus . . DLF LTD. (EARLIER DLF UNIVERSAL LTD.) ..... Respondent Through Mr. P.N. Monga, Adv. . . CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN . . O R D E R 13.09.2010 IA No. 3919/2010 . This is an application for condonation of delay of 289 days in refiling the appeal. We have heard Mr. N.P. Sahni, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant, and Mr.P.N. Monga, learned counsel for the respondent. Regard being had to the averments, we are of the considered opinion that sufficient cause exists for condonation of delay and, accordingly, is so ordered. The application stands disposed of. ITA No.431/2010 . Heard Mr. N.P. Sahni, senior standing counsel for the Revenue and Mr. P.N. ITA 431/2010 page 1 of 2 . . . . Monga, learned counsel for the assessee. It is submitted at Bar that this appeal is linked with ITA No.159/2010 and ITA No.408/2009 which have been directed to be listed on 30.9.2010. Let this appeal be listed on the same date before DB-III. . . . . CHIEF JUSTICE . . MANMOHAN, J SEPTEMBER 13, 2010 Aj . . . . . . . . . ITA 431/2010 page 2 of 2 . . $ 13
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026