COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI vs. M/S TUPPERWARE LTD

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 390 / 2013HC Delhi03 September 20131 pages
For Petitioner: KAMAL SAWHNEY
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the appeal by the Revenue had to be dismissed. The Court reasoned that the additions, which were the subject of the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c), related to the normal provisions of the Income Tax Act. However, the assessment for the relevant year was completed on book profits under Section 115JB. Crucially, the penalty order did not pertain to any wrong, misdeclaration, or addition to the book profits calculated under Section 115JB. The Court found that the decision in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd., (2010) 327 ITR 543 Delhi, was clearly applicable. The appeal was dismissed in limine.

What were the facts?

The Revenue has filed an appeal before the High Court of Delhi against an order pertaining to Assessment Year 2002-03. The appeal challenges additions that were the subject matter of a penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessment for the relevant year was completed on book profits under Section 115JB of the Act. The penalty order in question did not relate to any misdeclaration or addition concerning the book profits calculated under Section 115JB.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be levied on additions made under the normal provisions of the Income Tax Act when the assessment was completed on book profits under Section 115JB? The Revenue contended that the penalty order was valid. The Respondent (assessee) argued that since the assessment was completed on book profits under Section 115JB, any penalty proceedings initiated based on additions under the normal provisions were not sustainable. The Revenue relied on the general principles of penalty provisions. The Respondent relied on the decision of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd., (2010) 327 ITR 543 Delhi.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c),Section 115JB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . ITA 390/2013 . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant . Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. . . . versus . . . M/S TUPPERWARE LTD ..... Respondent . Through Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate. . . . CORAM: . HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA . HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA . O R D E R . 03.09.2013 . . . . . Present appeal by the Revenue which pertains to Assessment Year 2002-03 has to be dismissed as additions, subject matter of order of penalty under Section 271(1)(c), were relating to normal provisions, whereas the assessment was completed on book profits under Section 115 JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty order does not pertain to any wrong, misdeclaration or addition to the books profits under Section 115 JB. Decision of the Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd., (2010) 327 ITR 543 Delhi clearly applies. . The appeal is dismissed in limine. . . . . . SANJIV KHANNA, J . . . . . . . SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J . SEPTEMBER 03, 2013 . st . . . $ 3 .

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →