COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ZUARI LEADING & FINANCE CO

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 1387 / 2006HC Delhi21 September 20061 pages
For Petitioner: STANDING COUNSEL
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court admitted the appeal and framed substantial questions of law. The Court has not yet decided the merits of the appeal. The questions framed indicate that the core issue is the interplay between the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (specifically Chapter III B and Section 45Q) and Section 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the method of accounting and computation of income. The Tribunal's prior decision, which is under challenge, held that the RBI Act provisions, due to a non-obstante clause, would override Section 145(2) of the Income Tax Act. The High Court has not provided any findings or reasoning on these issues in the provided text. The operative direction is to admit the appeal and list it for hearing. No issue has been expressly left undecided, as the decision on the merits is pending.

What were the facts?

This is an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The respondent is M/s Zuari Leading and Finance Co. (Assessee). The assessment year(s) are not specified in the provided text. The appeal challenges the ITAT's decision regarding the applicability of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, in relation to the Income Tax Act, 1961. The procedural history indicates that the High Court has admitted the appeal and framed substantial questions of law. The appellant is directed to file paper books as per the rules, and the matter is to be heard in due course. The amount in dispute is not mentioned.

What were the issues?

The High Court framed the following substantial questions of law for consideration: 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in holding that the provisions of Chapter III B of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 override the provisions of Section 145(2) of the Income Tax Act because of the non-obstante clause in Section 45Q of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934? 2. Whether directions given by the Reserve Bank of India under the provisions of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 override the provisions of Section 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 3. If the above questions are answered in favour of the Assessee, what shall be its effect? Contentions: Assessee: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the Assessee. The ITAT's decision, which is being challenged, held that the provisions of Chapter III B of the RBI Act, 1934, override Section 145(2) of the Income Tax Act due to the non-obstante clause in Section 45Q of the RBI Act. The Assessee would likely argue in support of this ITAT finding. Revenue: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the Revenue. The Revenue, as the appellant, is challenging the ITAT's decision and would likely argue that Section 145 of the Income Tax Act should prevail over the RBI directions in this context.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 145,Section 145(2),Section 45Q

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . 6 ITA 1387/2006 . . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Advocate . versus . . M/S ZUARI LEADING and FINANCE CO .. Respondent Through . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR O R D E R 21.09.2006 . . . Admit. The following substantial questions of law arise for consideration of this Court in the present appeal : ?(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in holding that the provisions of Chapter III B of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 override the provisions of Section 145(2) of the Income Tax Act because of non-obstante clause in Section 45Q of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934? . (b) Whether directions given by the Reserve Bank of India under the provisions of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 override the provisions of Section 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? . . . (c) If the above questions are answered in favour of the Assessee what shall be its effect? . The appellant is directed to file paper books as per the rules. To be heard in regular course. . . VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J . . . . S. MURALIDHAR, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2006 rk

More judgments on Section 145

All 1,584 judgments and leading authorities on Section 145 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →