THE COMMISSIONER OF I.T. ASR. vs. NARINDER KUMAR.

PDF · subscribers
ITR/179/1999HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01038621199907 November 2013Bench: MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA,MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that an assessment completed without impleading all the legal representatives of a deceased assessee, especially when the Assessing Officer is aware of this fact, is a nullity. The court rejected the revenue's argument that the presence of one legal heir, Narinder Kumar, constituted acquiescence by all legal heirs. It was noted that Roshan Lal's estate was inherited by five legal representatives, and Narinder Kumar's presence did not imply representation of the entire estate with the consent of others. Therefore, the assessment order passed without impleading all legal representatives is null and void, requiring the Assessing Officer to proceed afresh after impleading them. The question of law was answered in favor of the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Roshan Lal, passed away during assessment proceedings. The Assessing Officer proceeded to finalize the assessment, noting that Roshan Lal's son, Narinder Kumar, had attended the proceedings. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the assessee's appeal, holding the assessment order invalid and a nullity due to the absence of service of notices on all legal representatives. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s order. The High Court was referred a question of law regarding the validity of the assessment in the absence of service on all legal representatives.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessment was invalid and a nullity in the absence of service of notices on all the legal representatives of the deceased-assessee, Roshan Lal? Assessee's Contention: Not recorded. Revenue's Contention: The revenue argued that although Roshan Lal passed away during assessment proceedings, his son Narinder Kumar represented him. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in holding the assessment proceedings a nullity due to the absence of other legal heirs. It was contended that Narinder Kumar's attendance at the proceedings implied a waiver of the plea that the assessment was a nullity in the absence of other legal heirs.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Reference No.179 of 1999 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Income Tax Reference No.179 of 1999

Date of Order: 07.11.2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Amritsar

...Appellant Versus Sh. Narinder Kumar, L/H of Sh. Roshan Lal C/o M/s Roshan Lal & Sons, Karmon Deori, Amritsar. ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has, pursuant to an order dated 27.01.1999, passed by this Court in I.T.C.No.38 of 1984, referred the following modified question of law:- “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessment was invalid and a nullity in the absence of service of notices on all the legal representatives of the deceased-assessee, Roshan Lal.” Counsel for the revenue submits that, though, it is true Kumar Naresh N 2013.11.20 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Income Tax Reference No.179 of 1999 -2- that Roshan Lal, the assessee, passed away during assessment proceedings but as he was represented prior to and, thereafter, by his son Narinder Kumar, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal have erred in holding that in the absence of other legal heirs, assessment proceedings are a nullity. It is contended that Narinder Kumar having attended assessment proceedings, is deemed to have waived the plea that in the absence of his other legal heirs, assessment proceedings are a nullity. No one is present on behalf of the respondent. We have heard counsel for the revenue, perused the assessment order, the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Admittedly, assessment viz-a-viz. Roshan Lal c/o M/s Roshan Lal & Sons was pending adjudication, before the Assessing Officer, when Roshan Lal passed away. The Assessing Officer proceeded to finalise the assessment by holding though Roshan Lal, the assessee, has passed away, re-assessment proceedings can be completed as Narinder Kumar, a son of the assessee, has attended proceedings. An appeal filed before the CIT(Appeals) was allowed by holding that in the absence of other legal heirs of the assessee, the assessment order is null and void. Aggrieved by this order, the revenue filed an appeal. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal by affirming the order passed by the CIT (Appeals). Kumar Naresh N 2013.11.20 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Income Tax Reference No.179 of 1999 -3- The question of law, forwarded for an answer, has been repeatedly answered by holding that an assessment completed without impleading all the legal representatives of a deceased- assessee, particularly where the Assessing Officer is aware of this fact, is a nullity. An argument raised by counsel for the revenue that as a son of assessee was present, the legal heirs have acquiesced in the assessment, is entirely misplaced. Admittedly, upon his demise, Roshan Lal's estate was inherited by five legal representatives. The presence of Narinder Kumar in assessment proceedings cannot raise an inference that he represented the entire estate with consent of other legal representatives, as to acquiesce in the assessment proceedings. In this view of the matter, we answer the question of law by holding that if an assessment order is passed without impleading all the legal representatives of a deceased assessee, such an order shall necessary be null and void thereby requiring the Assessing Officer to proceed afresh, after impleading the legal representatives. Disposed of accordingly. (RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE November 07, 2013 (DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON) nt

JUDGE Kumar Naresh N 2013.11.20 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →