MALABAR CEMENTS LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the matter should be remanded back to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for a fresh consideration on merits. The Court found that the ITAT had not considered the assessee's claim for depreciation on spare parts on merits, citing the non-production of evidence as the reason. However, the Court noted that evidence supporting the claim had actually been filed before the Tribunal via an e-mail (Annexure E), which was produced before the High Court. Therefore, to serve the ends of justice, the High Court set aside the ITAT's common order on the issue of depreciation for the relevant assessment years. The ITAT is directed to pass fresh orders after considering the evidence produced by the assessee, within three months of receiving a copy of the judgment. The assessee is also directed to furnish a fresh set of documents related to Annexure E to the Tribunal within two weeks. The Court clarified that other issues decided by the ITAT, which are not impugned in these appeals, are to be treated as finally decided.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Malabar Cements Ltd, filed appeals before the High Court of Kerala challenging an order dated 12.12.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin Bench. The appeals pertained to assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13, 2016-17, and 2017-18. The assessee contended that the ITAT had not considered its claim for depreciation on spare parts on merits. The ITAT's decision was based on the perceived lack of evidence from the assessee. However, the assessee argued that evidence was indeed submitted via an e-mail from its Chartered Accountant on 02.12.2022, which was not considered by the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in not considering the assessee's claim for depreciation on spare parts on merits, by holding that no evidence was produced by the assessee in support of its claim? (Question of law and fact, concerning the admissibility and consideration of evidence). Assessee's Contentions: - The assessee argued that evidence supporting its claim for depreciation on spare parts was indeed filed before the ITAT through an e-mail dated 02.12.2022 from its Chartered Accountant, along with notes on submissions. This evidence was produced as Annexure E with the present appeals. - The assessee contended that the ITAT's impugned order indicated that the Tribunal members had not reviewed this evidence, leading to a non-consideration of the claim on merits. - The assessee prayed for the impugned order to be set aside on the issue of depreciation and for the matter to be remanded to the ITAT for a fresh consideration on merits, in light of the evidence that was actually produced. Revenue's Contentions: - The judgment records that Sri. P.G. Jayashankar, learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, was heard, but does not detail the specific arguments made by the revenue.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M. TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946 ITA NO. 8 OF 2023 APPELLANT/APPELLANT MALABAR CEMENTS LIMITED AGED 54 YEARS WALAYAR, PUDUSSERY EAST, PALAKKAD (PAN - AABCM5814C), PIN - 678624 BY ADVS. ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS V.ABRAHAM MARKOS ISAAC THOMAS P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA JOHN VITHAYATHIL AIBEL MATHEW SIBY RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX PALAKKAD, PIN – 678001 BY ADVS. KEERTHIVAS GIRI SC-P.G.JAYASHANKAR. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.05.2024, ALONG WITH ITA.11/2023, 12/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M. TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946 ITA NO. 11 OF 2023 APPELLANT/APPELLANT MALABAR CEMENTS LIMITED AGED 54 YEARS WALAYAR, PUDUSSERY EAST, PALAKKAD (PAN - AABCM5814C)., PIN – 678624 BY ADVS. ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS V.ABRAHAM MARKOS ISAAC THOMAS P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA JOHN VITHAYATHIL AIBEL MATHEW SIBY RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX PALAKKAD, PIN – 678001 BY ADVS. ADV. P.G. JAYASHANKAR PGJ KEERTHIVAS GIRI THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.05.2024, ALONG WITH ITA.8/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M. TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946 ITA NO. 12 OF 2023 APPELLANT/APPELLANT MALABAR CEMENTS LIMITED WALAYAR, PUDUSSERY EAST, PALAKKAD (PAN - AABCM5814C), PIN - 678624 BY ADVS. ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS V.ABRAHAM MARKOS ISAAC THOMAS P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA JOHN VITHAYATHIL AIBEL MATHEW SIBY RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX PALAKKAD., PIN – 678001 BY ADV KEERTHIVAS GIRI SC SRI.P.G JAYASHANKAR THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.05.2024, ALONG WITH ITA.8/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M. TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946 ITA NO. 13 OF 2023 APPELLANT/APPELLANT MALABAR CEMENTS LIMITED AGED 54 YEARS WALAYAR, PUDUSSERY EAST, PALAKKAD (PAN- AABCM5814C), PIN - 678624 BY ADVS. ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS V.ABRAHAM MARKOS ISAAC THOMAS P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA JOHN VITHAYATHIL AIBEL MATHEW SIBY RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX PALAKKAD, PIN – 678001 BY ADVS. ADV. P.G. JAYASHANKAR KEERTHIVAS GIRI THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.05.2024, ALONG WITH ITA.8/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 5
J U D G M E N T ============ Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024 [ITA Nos.8/2023, 11/2023, 12/2023, 13/2023] Dr. A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.
In all these appeals the appellant/assessee-Malabar Cements Ltd impugns the order dated 12.12.2022 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench for the assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13, 2016-17 and 2017-18. 2. The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant points out that these appeals have essentially to be remanded back to the Appellate Tribunal for a decision on merits, since the Appellate Tribunal in the impugned order has not considered the contentions of the assessee on the merits of the claim for depreciation on spare parts solely because, according to the Tribunal, there was no evidence produced by the assessee in support of its claim for depreciation. It is the
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 6 submission of the learned Senior Counsel that the evidence to support the contentions of the appellant/assessee on merits was in fact produced before the Tribunal through an e-mail sent from the office of the Chartered Accountant (authorised representative of the appellant) on 02.12.2022, a copy of which e-mail, together with the notes on submissions, is produced along with these appeals as Annexure E. 3. The learned Senior Counsel further points out that it is apparent from a reading of the impugned order of the Tribunal that the members of the Tribunal did not have the occasion to go through the said evidence as it was not placed before them. He therefore prays that the impugned order of the Tribunal be set aside on the issue relating to the claim for depreciation, and the matter remanded to the Tribunal for a fresh consideration on merits in the light of the evidence that was in fact produced before the Tribunal. 4. We have heard Sri.P.G. Jayashankar, the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 7 5. On a consideration of the rival submissions, we are of the view that in as much as the Appellate Tribunal did not consider the claim for the appellant for depreciation on merits by citing the non production of evidence by the appellant as a reason for not discussing the matter on merits, and we find that as a matter of fact the evidence supporting the claim for depreciation had actually been filed before the Tribunal through Annexure E e-mail which is produced before us in these appeals, the ends of justice would require as to remand the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh consideration of the claim for depreciation made by the appellant on merits after considering the said evidence produced by the appellant. 5. Thus, without going into the merits of the case before us and without answering the questions of law raised in these appeals, we set aside the common order of the Appellate Tribunal on the issue of depreciation for the various assessment years aforementioned, and remand the said issue for fresh consideration by the Tribunal. The Appellate Tribunal shall pass fresh orders in the matter, after considering the evidence produced by the appellant before it, within three
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 8 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. To enable the Appellate Tribunal to pass fresh orders without any delay, the appellant is also directed to furnish a fresh set of the documents produced along with Annexure-E e-mail for consideration before the Tribunal within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. We make it clear that the other issues considered by the Tribunal, and which are not impugned in these appeals, shall be treated as finally decided by the common order of the appellate tribunal impugned in these appeals. The Income Tax Appeals are disposed as above.
Sd/-
DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE
Sd/- SYAM KUMAR V.M. JUDGE smm
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 9 APPENDIX OF ITA 8/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.02.2014 OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER Annexure B TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED 21.03.2014 FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFOR THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN Annexure C TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.10.2021 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN Annexure D TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND APPEAL DATED 06.12.2021 FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN. Annexure E TRUE COPY OF THE E-MAIL DATED 02.12.2022 ALONG WITH PAPER BOOK CONTAINING ANNEXURES SENT BY M/S. VARMA & VARMA, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF THE APPELLANT. Annexure E ANNEXURE E - PART 2 Annexure F IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.12.2022 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN IN ITA NO. 255/COCH/2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 10 APPENDIX OF ITA 11/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 22.11.2018 OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER Annexure B TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED 20.12.2018 FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFOR THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN Annexure C TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.10.2021 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN Annexure D TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND APPEAL DATED 06.12.2021 FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN. Annexure E TRUE COPY OF THE E-MAIL DATED 02.12.2022 ALONG WITH PAPER BOOK CONTAINING ANNEXURES SENT BY M/S. VARMA & VARMA, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF THE APPELLANT. Annexure F TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 09.12.2022 OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN IN ITA NO. 257/COCH/2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 11 APPENDIX OF ITA 12/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 27.03.2015 OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER Annexure B TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED 23.04.2015 FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFOR THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN Annexure C TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.10.2021 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN Annexure D TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND APPEAL DATED 06.12.2021 FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN. Annexure E TRUE COPY OF THE E-MAIL DATED 02.12.2022 ALONG WITH PAPER BOOK CONTAINING ANNEXURES SENT BY M/S. VARMA & VARMA, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF THE APPELLANT. Annexure F TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 09.12.2022 OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN IN ITA NO. 256/COCH/2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 12 APPENDIX OF ITA 13/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 05.12.2019 OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER Annexure B TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED 01.01.2020 FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFOR THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN Annexure C TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25.03.2021 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE DELHI Annexure D TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND APPEAL DATED 23.06.2021 FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN. Annexure E TRUE COPY OF THE E-MAIL DATED 02.12.2022 ALONG WITH PAPER BOOK CONTAINING ANNEXURES SENT BY M/S. VARMA & VARMA, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF THE APPELLANT. Annexure F TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 09.12.2022 OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN IN ITA NO. 71/COCH/2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18
ITA Nos.8,11,12 and 13 of 2023 13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
