KAUSHIK J SHAH vs. PR. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 OR HIS SUCCESSOR

PDF · subscribers
SCA/15708/2021HC GujaratGJHC24053676202127 October 2021Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, after hearing the arguments for some time, acceded to the request of the learned advocate for the petitioner to withdraw the petition. The Court explicitly clarified that it had not entered into the merits of the matter. Therefore, no finding was given on the validity of the order passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Ahmedabad, nor were any directions issued regarding the waiver or reduction of interest. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn, with no decision on the substantive issues raised.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Kaushik J Shah, filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The petition challenged an order dated 21.01.2021 passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Ahmedabad, under Section 119(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This order had rejected the petitioner's application for reduction or waiver of interest charged under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act for Assessment Year 2013-14. The petitioner sought various reliefs including quashing the impugned order and directing the respondent to waive or reduce the interest.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the order dated 21.01.2021 passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Ahmedabad, under Section 119(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rejecting the petitioner's application for waiver/reduction of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C for AY 2013-14, is liable to be quashed and set aside? Assessee's Contention: The petitioner sought to challenge the order rejecting their application for waiver/reduction of interest. The petitioner also sought directions to consider a fresh application filed on 12.02.2021 and to amend the petition. Revenue's Contention: No specific contentions of the revenue are recorded in the judgment. The judgment indicates that after some arguments, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 119(2)(a),Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

C/SCA/15708/2021 ORDER DATED: 27/10/2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15708 of 2021 ========================================================== KAUSHIK J SHAH Versus PR. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 OR HIS SUCCESSOR ========================================================== Appearance: MR SN DIVATIA(1378) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK Date : 27/10/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking to challenge the order dated 21.01.2021 passed under Section 119(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Ahmedabad with the following prayers: “10.0… (a) to issue a writ of certiorari or in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, orders or directions quashing and setting aside the impugned order dt 21-01-2021 passed u/s 119(2)(a) of the Act [ANNEXURE A] rejecting the application filed by the Petitioner for reduction or waiver of interest charged u/s.234A, 234B and 234C of the Act for A.Y.2013- Page 1 of 3

C/SCA/15708/2021 ORDER DATED: 27/10/2021 14. (b) to issue a writ of mandamus or in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, orders or directions to the Respondent to waive/reduce the interest charged u/s.234A, 234B and 234C of the Act for A.Y.2013-14. (c) to issue a writ of mandamus or in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, orders or directions to the Respondent to consider and dispose of the fresh the application filed on 12-02- 2021. to allow the Petitioner to amend the Petition in view of the order passed, if any, by the (d)to allow the petitioner to amend the petition in view of the order passed, if any, by the Respondent disposing of the objections. (e) to call for the records of the proceedings, look into them and be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the impugned notice and order. (f) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition ask the Respondent and its subordinates not Page 2 of 3

C/SCA/15708/2021 ORDER DATED: 27/10/2021 to take any action or to do anything in furtherance and pursuance of this impugned order. (g) to allow this Petition with cost. (h) to pass any further or other orders as the Hon’ble Court may deem proper in the interest of justice and in the circumstances of the case.” 2. After arguing for some time, learned advocate, Mr.S.N.Divatia has sought to withdraw this petition to take legal recourse available under the law. 3. Request is acceded to. Present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. It is clarified that this Court has not entered into the merit of the matter. Sd/- (SONIA GOKANI, J) Sd/- (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J) M.M.MIRZA Page 3 of 3

More judgments on Section 234A

All 5,126 judgments and leading authorities on Section 234A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →