COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V vs. UDAY H VORA

PDF · subscribers

TAXAP/402/2013HC GujaratGJHC24043373201327 January 2020Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA2 pages

AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the appeals were not pressed by the Revenue in view of Circular No. 17/2019, which stipulates a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000 for appeals before the High Court. Consequently, the appeals were disposed of in accordance with this policy. The Court reserved the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeals in case of any difficulty. The specific tax effect or the original assessment years were not recorded in the judgment.

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income Tax-V filed two tax appeals, R/TAX APPEAL NO. 398 of 2013 and R/TAX APPEAL NO. 402 of 2013, against Sonal D Vora. The appeals were listed for an appropriate order due to low tax effect. The appeals were not pressed by the appellant (Revenue) in view of Circular No. 17/2019, dated August 8, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. This circular sets monetary limits for filing appeals before various authorities. The High Court noted the monetary limit for appeals before the High Court is Rs. 1,00,00,000.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the appeals should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect as per Circular No. 17/2019? (Question of law) The Revenue argued that the appeals were not pressed due to the low tax effect, referencing Circular No. 17/2019. The Revenue contended that the monetary limit for appeals before the High Court is Rs. 1,00,00,000, and these appeals fall below that threshold. The Assessee did not present any arguments as the rule was unserved.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

C/TAXAP/398/2013 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 398 of 2013 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 402 of 2013 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V Versus SONAL D VORA ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 RULE UNSERVED(68) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA

Date : 27/01/2020

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. The Registry has notified the appeals for the purpose of passing an appropriate order. The captioned appeals have been notified because of the low tax effect. The appeals are to be disposed of keeping in mind the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. These tax appeals are not pressed in view of the low tax effect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 3. According to the new policy as reflected from the Circular Page 1 of 2

C/TAXAP/398/2013 ORDER referred to above, the table for monetary limits is as follows: Sr. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income Tax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000

In view of the aforesaid, the appeals are disposed of accordingly. In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) Vahid Page 2 of 2

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →