PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 vs. SHRI KIRAN J. TRIVEDI
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the Tax Appeal was not pressed by the Revenue in view of the low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019 dated August 8, 2019. The circular provides updated monetary limits for filing appeals, with appeals before the High Court having a limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000. Since the appeal was not pressed on this basis, the court disposed of the appeal accordingly. The court also reserved the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal in case of any difficulty. No specific finding was made on the merits of the original dispute, as the appeal was decided on procedural grounds related to the appeal policy.
What were the facts?
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 (Revenue) filed a Tax Appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad against Shri Kiran J. Trivedi (assessee). The appeal was notified for an appropriate order due to a low tax effect. The court was to dispose of the appeal in light of Circular No. 17/2019, dated August 8, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. This circular outlines monetary limits for filing appeals. The appeal was not pressed by the Revenue in view of this circular and the low tax effect.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Tax Appeal should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect as per Circular No. 17/2019? (Question of law) The Revenue argued that the appeal was not pressed due to the low tax effect, referencing Circular No. 17/2019. The assessee's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The circular establishes monetary limits for appeals before various authorities, including the High Court, where the limit is Rs. 1,00,00,000. The appeal was deemed to fall within the scope of this circular, leading to its disposal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
C/TAXAP/867/2017 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 867 of 2017 ========================================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Versus SHRI KIRAN J. TRIVEDI ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 DARSHAN R PATEL(8486) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 27/01/2020
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. The Registry has notified the appeal for the purpose of passing an appropriate order. The captioned appeal has been notified because of the low tax effect. The appeal is to be disposed of keeping in mind the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. This tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 3. According to the new policy as reflected from the Circular referred to above, the table for monetary limits is as follows: Page 1 of 2
C/TAXAP/867/2017 ORDER Sr. No. Appeals/SLPs in Incometax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of accordingly. In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) KUMAR ALOK Page 2 of 2
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026