PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, vs. FERROMATIC MILACRON (INDIA) LTD,

PDF · subscribers

TAXAP/741/2017HC GujaratGJHC24057087201727 January 2020Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA2 pages

AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the appeal was not pressed in view of the low tax effect, having regard to Circular No. 17/2019. The Court noted the monetary limits specified in the circular for appeals before different authorities, including Rs. 1,00,00,000 for appeals before the High Court. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of accordingly. The Court reserved liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal in case of any difficulty. No specific finding was made on the merits of the original dispute, as the appeal was withdrawn based on the circular.

What were the facts?

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 (Revenue) filed a Tax Appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad against Ferromatic Milacron (India) Ltd (Assessee). The appeal was notified for an appropriate order due to a low tax effect. The High Court referred to Circular No. 17/2019 dated August 8, 2019, issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi, which sets monetary limits for filing appeals. The circular specifies a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000 for appeals before the High Court.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the appeal should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect, considering the policy laid down in Circular No. 17/2019? (Question of law and fact) The Revenue argued that the appeal was not pressed due to the low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019. The Assessee did not present any arguments as the appeal was not pressed by the Revenue.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

C/TAXAP/741/2017 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 741 of 2017 ========================================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, Versus FERROMATIC MILACRON (INDIA) LTD, ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 RULE SERVED(64) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA

Date : 27/01/2020

ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. The Registry has notified the appeal for the purpose of passing an appropriate order. The captioned appeal has been notified because of the low tax effect. The appeal is to be disposed of keeping in mind the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. This tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 3. According to the new policy as reflected from the Circular referred to above, the table for monetary limits is as follows: Page 1 of 2

C/TAXAP/741/2017 ORDER Sr. No. Appeals/SLPs in Incometax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of accordingly. In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) GIRISH Page 2 of 2

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →