THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. LOK PRAKASHAN LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeal is not pressed by the Revenue in view of the low tax effect, considering Circular No. 17/2019. The circular specifies monetary limits for appeals, with Rs. 1,00,00,000 being the limit for appeals before the High Court. Consequently, the Court disposed of the appeal accordingly. The Revenue was granted liberty to revive the tax appeal in case of any difficulty. No specific finding was made on the merits of the original dispute, as the appeal was not pressed.
What were the facts?
This matter concerns a Tax Appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against Lok Prakashan Ltd. (Assessee). The appeal was listed before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The appeal was notified for the purpose of passing an appropriate order due to a low tax effect. The Revenue decided not to press the appeal based on Circular No. 17/2019, dated August 8, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which sets monetary limits for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to a low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The assessee did not make any specific contentions recorded in the judgment. The appeal was not pressed by the Revenue. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue argued that the appeal should be disposed of in light of Circular No. 17/2019, dated August 8, 2019, which provides for a monetary limit for appeals before the High Court. The monetary limit for appeals before the High Court, as per the circular, is Rs. 1,00,00,000.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
C/TAXAP/567/2015 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 567 of 2015 ========================================================== THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus LOK PRAKASHAN LTD. ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 27/01/2020
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. The Registry has notified the appeal for the purpose of passing an appropriate order. The captioned appeal has been notified because of the low tax effect. The appeal is to be disposed of keeping in mind the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. This tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. Page 1 of 2
C/TAXAP/567/2015 ORDER 3. According to the new policy as reflected from the Circular referred to above, the table for monetary limits is as follows: Sr.No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetray
Limit (Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of accordingly. In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) PALAK Page 2 of 2
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026