PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAJKOT vs. JAYANTIBHAI THAKKAR

PDF · subscribers

TAXAP/534/2017HC GujaratGJHC24056996201727 January 2020Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA2 pages

AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the Tax Appeal is not pressed by the Revenue in view of the low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019 dated August 8, 2019. The Circular outlines monetary limits for appeals, and the appeal falls within the category where it is not to be pressed. Consequently, the appeal is disposed of accordingly. The Court also reserved liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal in case of any difficulty. No specific finding on the merits of the original dispute was made as the appeal was not pressed.

What were the facts?

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Rajkot (the Revenue) filed a Tax Appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The appeal was against an order concerning Jayantibhai Thakkar (the assessee). The appeal was notified for an appropriate order due to low tax effect. The Revenue decided not to press the appeal in light of Circular No. 17/2019 dated August 8, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which sets monetary limits for filing appeals.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the appeal is to be dismissed due to low tax effect as per Circular No. 17/2019? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the assessee. However, the appeal was not pressed by the Revenue. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue submitted that the appeal should be disposed of in view of the low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019. The Circular specifies monetary limits for appeals before various authorities, including the High Court, which was Rs. 1,00,00,000.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

C/TAXAP/534/2017 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 534 of 2017 ========================================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAJKOT Versus JAYANTIBHAI THAKKAR ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 RULE SERVED(64) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA

Date : 27/01/2020

ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. The Registry has notified the appeal for the purpose of passing an appropriate order. The captioned appeal has been notified because of the low tax effect. The appeal is to be disposed of keeping in mind the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. This tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 3. According to the new policy as reflected from the Circular referred to above, the table for monetary limits is as follows: Page 1 of 2

C/TAXAP/534/2017 ORDER Sr. No. Appeals/SLPs in Incometax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of accordingly. In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) GIRISH Page 2 of 2

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →