COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - III vs. M/S ALPANIL INDUSTRIES

PDF · subscribers
TAXAP/330/2010HC GujaratGJHC24046047201004 September 2018Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court granted permission to the Revenue to withdraw the appeals. The Court reasoned that the withdrawal was sought by the department under instructions, citing the CBDT circular dated 11.07.2018. This circular provides a threshold for the tax effect below which appeals should not be preferred or maintained. Since the tax effect in these appeals was below this threshold, the department was enabled to withdraw them. Consequently, the Tax Appeals were disposed of as withdrawn. No specific finding was made on the merits of the original appeals, as they were withdrawn by the appellant.

What were the facts?

The appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I against Sunil Kumar B. Handa. The appeals challenged various orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for different assessment years. The specific assessment years and the amounts in dispute are not detailed in this order. The procedural history involves multiple tax appeals filed by the Revenue before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the appeals filed by the Revenue should be permitted to be withdrawn. This issue turns on the applicability of CBDT Circular dated 11.07.2018. Assessee's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions from the assessee regarding the withdrawal of appeals. The withdrawal was sought by the Revenue. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue, through its learned advocate, sought permission to withdraw these appeals. The basis for this request was that the tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by CBDT in its circular dated 11.07.2018, which enables the department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

C/TAXAP/1420/2007 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1420 of 2007 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1090 of 2008 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1265 of 2007 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 128 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1320 of 2009 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1353 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1462 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1527 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1550 of 2007 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 167 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1702 of 2008 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 177 of 2009 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 182 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 183 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1844 of 2008 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1845 of 2008 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 18 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1962 of 2009 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1964 of 2009 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2455 of 2009 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 256 of 2009 With Page 1 of 3

C/TAXAP/1420/2007 ORDER R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2669 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 330 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 62 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 63 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 64 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 66 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 678 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 67 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 68 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 723 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 769 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 76 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 77 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 863 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 864 of 2010 ========================================================== THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Versus SUNILKUMAR B HANDA ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA

Page 2 of 3

C/TAXAP/1420/2007 ORDER Date : 04/09/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned advocate Ms. Mauna Bhatt, under instructions from the department, sought permission to withdraw these appeals since the tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by CBDT in its circular dated 11.07.2018 enabling the department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court. Permission is granted. Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly. (AKIL KURESHI, J) (B.N. KARIA, J) JYOTI V. JANI Page 3 of 3

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →