PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. GUJARAT STATE ENERGY GENERATION LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeal was not pressed by the Revenue in view of the low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019. The circular establishes monetary limits for appeals, with Rs. 1,00,00,000 being the limit for appeals before the High Court. Since the appeal fell within the scope of this circular, it was disposed of accordingly. The Court granted liberty to the Revenue to revive the tax appeal in case of any difficulty. No specific finding on the merits of the original dispute was made, as the appeal was not pressed.
What were the facts?
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) filed a Tax Appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad against Gujarat State Energy Generation Ltd (Assessee). The appeal was notified for an appropriate order due to low tax effect. The Court referred to Circular No. 17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which sets monetary limits for filing appeals. The appeal was not pressed by the Revenue in light of this circular and the monetary limit for appeals before the High Court being Rs. 1,00,00,000. The Court disposed of the appeal accordingly, reserving liberty for the Revenue to revive it in case of difficulty.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019? (Question of law and fact, concerning the applicability of the circular and the monetary limits prescribed therein). Contentions: Assessee: Not recorded. Revenue: The appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect and the monetary limits stipulated in Circular No. 17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019, which specifies a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000 for appeals before the High Court.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
C/TAXAP/318/2017 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 318 of 2017 ========================================================== PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus GUJARAT STATE ENERGY GENERATION LTD ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 27/01/2020
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. The Registry has notified the appeal for the purpose of passing an appropriate order. The captioned appeal has been notified because of the low tax effect. The appeal is to be disposed of keeping in mind the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. This tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 3. According to the new policy as reflected from the Circular referred to above, the table for monetary limits is as follows: Page 1 of 2
C/TAXAP/318/2017 ORDER Sr. No. Appeals/SLPs in Incometax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of accordingly. In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) GIRISH Page 2 of 2
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026