PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. ACQUAFIL POLYMERS CO. P. LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019 dated August 8, 2019. The circular establishes monetary limits for appeals, with the limit for appeals before the High Court being Rs. 1,00,00,000. The court disposed of the appeal accordingly. The Revenue was granted liberty to revive the tax appeal in case of any difficulty. The specific tax effect or the grounds of the original appeal were not discussed or decided.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1 against ACQUAFIL POLYMERS CO. P. LTD. The appeal was before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The case was notified for passing an appropriate order due to low tax effect. The appeal was to be disposed of in light of Circular No. 17/2019 dated August 8, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The circular outlines new monetary limits for filing appeals. The monetary limit for appeals before the High Court is Rs. 1,00,00,000.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019? The Revenue contended that the appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect, citing Circular No. 17/2019. The Assessee did not record any specific contentions in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
C/TAXAP/294/2019 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 294 of 2019 ========================================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 Versus ACQUAFIL POLYMERS CO. P. LTD. ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 RULE UNSERVED(68) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C. RAO
Date : 09/09/2019
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. The Registry has notified the appeal for the purpose of passing an appropriate order. The captioned appeal has been notified because of the low tax effect. The appeal is to be disposed of keeping in mind the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. This tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 3. According to the new policy as reflected from the Circular referred to above, the table for monetary limits is as follows: Page 1 of 2
C/TAXAP/294/2019 ORDER Sr. No. Appeals/SLPs in Incometax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of accordingly. In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (A. C. RAO, J) aruna Page 2 of 2
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026