COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. N R AGRAWAL INDUSTRIES LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the Tax Appeal was not pressed by the Revenue in view of the low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019. This circular establishes monetary limits for appeals, with appeals before the High Court having a limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000. Consequently, the Court disposed of the appeal in accordance with the policy reflected in the circular. The Revenue was granted liberty to revive the tax appeal in case of any difficulty. The specific tax effect or the assessment year(s) are not recorded in the judgment.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) filed a Tax Appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad against N R Agrawal Industries Ltd (Assessee). The appeal was notified for passing an appropriate order due to low tax effect. The appeal was to be disposed of in accordance with Circular No. 17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which sets monetary limits for filing appeals. The appeal was not pressed by the Revenue in view of this circular.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Tax Appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable before the High Court, considering the monetary limits prescribed by Circular No. 17/2019? The Revenue argued that the appeal was not pressed due to the low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019. The circular provides monetary limits for appeals before various authorities, including the High Court, which is Rs. 1,00,00,000. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the Assessee regarding the maintainability of the appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
C/TAXAP/287/2014 ORDER DATED: 07/01/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 287 of 2014 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus N R AGRAWAL INDUSTRIES LTD ========================================================== Appearance: MR MANISH R. BHATT, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR M R BHATT & CO. (5953) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 07/01/2022
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. The Registry has notified the appeal for the purpose of passing an appropriate order. The captioned appeal has been notified because of the low tax effect. The appeal is to be disposed of keeping in mind the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8 th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. This tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8 th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 3. According to the new policy as reflected from the Circular referred to above, the table for monetary limits is as follows:- Page 1 of 2
C/TAXAP/287/2014 ORDER DATED: 07/01/2022 Sr. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of accordingly. In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (NISHA M. THAKORE,J) A. B. VAGHELA Page 2 of 2
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026