COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S TRIDENT CREATION PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeal is not pressed by the Revenue in view of the low tax effect, as per Circular No. 17/2019 dated August 8, 2019. The Court noted the revised monetary limits for appeals, with Rs. 1,00,00,000 being the limit for appeals before the High Court. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of accordingly. The Court also reserved the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal in case of any difficulty. No specific findings were made on the merits of the original dispute, as the appeal was withdrawn by the appellant.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) filed a Tax Appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad against an order concerning M/s Trident Creation Pvt Ltd (Assessee). The appeal was notified for an appropriate order due to low tax effect. The Revenue decided not to press the appeal in light of Circular No. 17/2019 dated August 8, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). This circular revised the monetary limits for filing appeals. The table provided in the circular indicates a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000 for appeals before the High Court.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect as per Circular No. 17/2019? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The assessee did not make any explicit arguments recorded in the judgment. However, the appeal was not pressed by the Revenue. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue contended that the appeal should be disposed of in view of the low tax effect, citing Circular No. 17/2019 dated August 8, 2019. This circular sets revised monetary limits for filing appeals, and the current appeal falls below the threshold for High Court appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
C/TAXAP/2537/2010 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2537 of 2010 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/S TRIDENT CREATION PVT LTD ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C. RAO
Date : 09/09/2019
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. The Registry has notified the appeal for the purpose of passing an appropriate order. The captioned appeal has been notified because of the low tax effect. The appeal is to be disposed of keeping in mind the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2. This tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low tax effect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8th August, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 3. According to the new policy as reflected from the Circular referred to above, the table for monetary limits is as follows: Page 1 of 2
C/TAXAP/2537/2010 ORDER Sr. No. Appeals/SLPs in Incometax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000 4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of accordingly. In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for the Revenue to revive the tax appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (A. C. RAO, J) aruna Page 2 of 2
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026