COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. M/S AVANI EXPORTS

PDF · subscribers
TAXAP/2273/2010HC GujaratGJHC24046379201005 September 2018Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court granted permission to the Revenue to withdraw the appeals. The reasoning provided is that the tax effect in these appeals falls below the minimum threshold limit stipulated by the CBDT's circular dated 11.07.2018. This circular permits the department to withdraw or not prefer appeals where the tax effect is below a certain amount. The High Court's decision is based on this administrative instruction from the CBDT, allowing the appeals to be disposed of as withdrawn. No decision on the merits of the underlying tax disputes was made.

What were the facts?

The appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Central - II, against Swiss Glass Coat Equipment Ltd. The appeals were preferred before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The specific assessment years are not mentioned in the provided text. The appeals challenged orders passed by lower authorities, but the nature of those orders or the specific authorities are not detailed. The procedural history relevant here is that the department sought permission to withdraw these appeals.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the appeals filed by the Revenue should be permitted to be withdrawn. This issue arises from the Revenue's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue's contention is that the tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by the CBDT in its circular dated 11.07.2018, which enables the department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the assessee's side on this procedural matter.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

C/TAXAP/1437/2010 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1437 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 145 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 147 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1529 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1559 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1611 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1838 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1956 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2243 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2244 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2250 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2273 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2414 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2417 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2421 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2575 of 2010 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 286 of 2017 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 418 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 485 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 539 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 566 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 569 of 2011 Page 1 of 3

C/TAXAP/1437/2010 ORDER With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 594 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 596 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 597 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 603 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 604 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 61 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 623 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 666 of 2015 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 736 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 786 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 787 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 78 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 972 of 2017 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - II Versus SWISS GLASS COAT EQUIPMENT LTD ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA

Date : 05/09/2018

COMMON ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned   advocate   Mrs.Mauna   Bhatt,   under Page 2 of 3

C/TAXAP/1437/2010 ORDER instructions from the department, sought permission to   withdraw   these   appeals   since   the   tax   effect involved   in   these   appeals   is   below   the   minimum threshold   limit   provided   by   CBDT   in   its   circular dated   11.07.2018   enabling   the   department   to   prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court. Permission is granted. Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly. (AKIL KURESHI, J) (B.N. KARIA, J) ANKIT SHAH Page 3 of 3

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →