THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION

PDF · subscribers
TAXAP/759/2019HC GujaratGJHC24073029201923 December 2019Author: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court noted that the controversy in the present case was concluded by its earlier judgment dated 27.09.2019 in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Gujarat Cricket Association, rendered in Tax Appeals No.268 of 2012 and allied matters. In that judgment, the issue had been decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Consequently, the High Court held that the present appeal does not give rise to any question of law, much less a substantial question of law, warranting interference. The appeal was accordingly dismissed. The specific findings of the ITAT on the issues of exemptions under Sections 11 and 12, and the applicability of Section 2(15) read with Section 13(8) of the Act, were not detailed as the High Court relied on its prior decision.

What were the facts?

The Revenue has filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order dated 11.06.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench ‘B’. The appeal pertains to assessment year 2014-15 and concerns the allowance of exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act to the assessee, Baroda Cricket Association. The Revenue contends that the assessee is involved in widespread commercial activities and that its activities fall within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act, thereby disentitling it to the claimed exemptions. The ITAT had previously allowed these exemptions.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in allowing the benefit of exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act without considering that the assessee is involved in widespread commercial activities, and holding that the assessee's activity is covered under the first and second proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in allowing the benefit of exemption under Section 11(1)(a) of the Act of Rs.1,47,98,329/- without appreciating that the assessee is covered by the provisions of Section 2(15) read with Section 13(8) of the Act? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in allowing the benefit of exemption under Section 11(2) of the Act of Rs.4,50,00,000/- without appreciating that the assessee is covered by the provisions of Section 2(15) read with Section 13(8) of the Act? Contentions: Assessee: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue: The assessee is involved in widespread commercial activities and its activities are covered by Section 2(15) of the Act, disentitling it to exemptions under Sections 11 and 12.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 11,Section 12,Section 2(15),Section 13(8)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/TAXAP/759/2019 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 759 of 2019 ========================================================== THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) Versus BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 23/12/2019

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1.

By   this   appeal   under   section   260A   of   the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), the appellant Revenue has challenged the order dated 11.06.2019 made by the Income Tax Appellate   Tribunal,   Ahmedabad   Bench   ‘B’   in   ITA No.2675/Ahd/2017 for assessment year 2014­15 by proposing the following three questions stated to be substantial questions of law: “[A] Whether   on   the   facts   and   circumstances of   the   case   and   in   law,   the   Tribunal   was justified   in   allowing   the   benefit   of exemptions u/s.11 and 12 of the Act without considering   the   fact   that   the   assessee   is involved in  widespread commercial activities in nature of business and holding that the C/TAXAP/759/2019 ORDER activity   of   the   assessee   is   covered   under first and second proviso to section 2(5) of the Act? [B] Whether   on   the   facts   and   circumstances of   the   case   and   in   law,   the   Tribunal   was justified   in   allowing   the   benefit   of exemptions   u/s.11(1)(a)   of   the   Act   of Rs.l,47,98,329/­   without   appreciating   the fact   that   the   assessee   is   covered   by   the provisions of section 2(15) r.w.s. 13(8) of the Act? [C] Whether   on   the   facts   and   circumstances of   the   case   and   in   law,   the   Tribunal   was justified   in   allowing   the   benefit   of exemptions   u/s.l1(2)   of   the   Act   of Rs.4,50,00,000/­   without   appreciating   the fact   that   the   assessee   is   covered   by   the provisions   of section  2(15)  r.w.s  13(8)  of the Act?”

2.

Heard   Mrs.   Mauna   Bhatt,   learned   senior standing   counsel   for   the   appellant,   who   has reiterated the grounds set out in the memorandum of appeal.

3.

It   is   an   admitted   position   that   the controversy involved in the present case stands concluded by a judgment dated 27.09.2019 passed by   this   court   in   the   case   of   Commissioner   of Income   Tax   (Exemption)   v.   Gujarat   Cricket Association   rendered   in   Tax   Appeals   No.268   of 2012 and allied matters, wherein the issue has been   decided   in   favour   of   the   assessee   and against the Revenue. Under the circumstances, it C/TAXAP/759/2019 ORDER is   not   necessary   to   set   out   the   facts   and contentions in detail.

4.

For the reasons recorded in the judgment and order dated 27.09.2019 made in Tax Appeals No.268 of 2012 and allied matters, this appeal does not give rise to any question of law, much less, any substantial   question   of   law,   warranting interference.   The   appeal,   therefore,   fails   and is, accordingly, dismissed. (HARSHA DEVANI, J) (SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J) PRAVIN KARUNAN

More judgments on Section 11

All 7,190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →