RAMESHWAR PRASAD GURJAR (A.Y. 2015-16) S/O SHRI PRABHAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The court noted the petitioner's prayer to approach the Appellate Authority and the statement that an application for waiver of pre-deposit due to hardship had been moved. The court directed that if such an application is moved before the Appellate Authority, it shall be considered, and appropriate orders will be passed in accordance with the law. No decision was made on the merits of the case.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Rameshwar Prasad Gurjar, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, challenging an order or action related to Assessment Year 2015-16. The respondents are the Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, and the Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition to approach the Appellate Authority and had also filed an application for waiver of pre-deposit due to hardship.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to approach the Appellate Authority? (Question of procedure) Assessee's Contention: The petitioner's counsel argued that they wished to withdraw the writ petition to pursue remedies before the Appellate Authority. They also highlighted that an application for waiver of pre-deposit had been moved, citing hardship. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments or contentions from the revenue's side regarding the withdrawal of the petition.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Order 02/06/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to approach the Appellate Authority. He further states that he moved an application for waiver of the pre-deposit by highlighting the aspect of hardship.
In the light of the above, the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted.
The writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
[2023:RJ-JP:12898-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-8739/2023]
In case an application, as has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner, is moved, the same shall be considered by the Appellate Authority and appropriate orders be passed in accordance with law. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH),CJ KAMLESH KUMAR/Mohita -25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026