AVITTATHOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.706, vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1),
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the second respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), to consider and dispose of the stay petition (Ext. P4(a)) as expeditiously as possible, preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Additionally, recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal before the second respondent were stayed for four weeks from the date of the judgment. The court did not decide on the merits of the underlying appeal or the stay petition itself, but rather on the procedural aspect of its timely disposal.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Avittathoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., represented by its Secretary, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner sought a direction for the second respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), to expeditiously consider and dispose of a stay petition (Ext. P4(a)). The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), is the first respondent. The writ petition was filed on April 2, 2019. The court heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel and the Standing Counsel for the respondents.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court should direct the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to expeditiously dispose of the stay petition filed by the petitioner? (Question of procedure/administrative direction). The petitioner argued for an expeditious disposal of their stay petition. The revenue's contentions are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Heard Sri. V. Venugopal, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. O.P. Jos Winson instructed by Sri. Christopher Abraham, the learned Standing Counsel.
The petitioner prays for a direction to the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext. P4 (a) stay petition expeditiously.
Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext. P4 (a)stay petition as expeditiously as possible, preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal before the second respondent are stayed for four weeks from today. S.V.BHATTI JUDGE SVP
WP(C).No. 10211 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 AOF THE CERTIFICATE OF CLASSIFICATION ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), MUKUNDAPURAM. EXHIBIT P2 AOF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 22.12.2018. EXHIBIT P3 AOF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 22.12.2018 EXHIBIT P4 AOF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 A AOF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 AOF THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 221(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT. EXHIBIT P6 AOF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.12.2017 IN WPC.38566 OF 2017. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //// PA TO JUDGE
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- Korba Steel Castings vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 29 Oct 2026