KULATHUPUZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BAN LTD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala directed the 2nd respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), to dispose of the stay petition filed by the petitioner within a period of two months. The Court also ordered that recovery proceedings based on the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance until the disposal of the stay petition. The writ petition was disposed of in light of these directions. No specific issue was left undecided; the court granted the relief sought by the petitioner regarding the disposal of the stay petition.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Kulathupuzha Service Co-operative Bank Ltd, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner was aggrieved by an assessment order, referred to as Ext.P1. In response to this assessment order, the petitioner had filed an appeal and a stay petition before the 2nd respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The writ petition was filed seeking a direction for the disposal of the pending stay petition.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the 2nd respondent (Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)) should be directed to dispose of the stay petition filed by the petitioner? The petitioner contended that they had filed an appeal and a stay petition against the assessment order and sought a direction for the expeditious disposal of the stay petition. The revenue's contentions are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order, filed Ext.P3 appeal along with Ext.P4 stay petition before the 2nd respondent. In the light of the above, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the stay petition within a period of two months, after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till the disposal of stay petition recovery based on the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE SMA
WP(C).No. 7076 of 2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 AOF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017 DATED 28.12.2018. EXHIBIT P2 AOF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28.12.2018 EXHIBIT P3 AOF THE ONLINE APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT. P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 04.01.2019 AL0NG WITH STATEMENT OF FACTS AND GROUNDS. EXHIBIT P4 AOF THE STAY PETITION DATED 08.02.2019, FILED BY THE PETITIIONER IN EXT. P3 APPEAL. EXHIBIT P5 AOF THE NOTICE NO. DEMAND/W- 2/KLM/2018-19 DATED 20.02.2019 (WRONGLY SHOWN AS 20.02.2018) ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6 AOF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.02.2019 IN WP(C) NO. 5070 OF 2019. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL SMA
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026