THE MANNARKKAD GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED P-630, vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court directed the second respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), to consider the stay application (Ext.P3) within a period of two months. Furthermore, the Court ordered that recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned assessment order shall be kept in abeyance until the disposal of the stay application. The Court did not decide on the merits of the appeal or the stay application itself, but rather on the procedural aspect of its consideration. The operative direction is to consider the stay application and to keep recovery proceedings in abeyance in the interim.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Mannarkkad Government Employees Co-operative Credit Society Limited, filed an appeal against an assessment order (Ext.P1) under the Income Tax Act before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (second respondent). Along with the appeal, the petitioner also filed a stay application (Ext.P3) seeking to stay recovery proceedings pending the appeal. This writ petition was filed before the High Court of Kerala seeking a direction for the disposal of the stay application.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the second respondent (Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)) should be directed to consider the stay application filed by the petitioner. The petitioner contended that they have filed an appeal and a stay application and sought a direction for the expeditious disposal of the stay application. The revenue did not record any specific contentions in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner,
as against
Ext.P1 assessment order under the Income Tax Act, filed Ext.P2 appeal before the second respondent. The petitioner also filed Ext.P3 stay application. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider Ext.P3 stay application within two months. Till the disposal of the stay application, recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned order in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE ln
WP(C).No.8550/2019 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 28.12.2018 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 19.1.2019 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 18.1.2019 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL. //// P.A.TO JUDGE
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026