MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala granted permission to the review petitioners to withdraw their review petitions. Consequently, the review petitions were dismissed as withdrawn. The court did not delve into the merits of the original appeals or the grounds for review, as the decision was based solely on the request for withdrawal by the petitioners. No specific findings were made on any substantive legal issues, and the operative direction was to dismiss the petitions as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
These review petitions were filed before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam. The review petitioners are Muthoot Properties and Investments and Mar Gregorious Memorial Muthoot Medical Centre. The respondent is the Commissioner of Income Tax. The review petitions arise from orders passed in Income Tax Appeals (ITA) No. 140/2011, 136/2011, 142/2011, and 147/2011, all of which were judgments of the High Court. The review petitions were listed for admission on April 3, 2019. The counsel for the review petitioners sought permission to withdraw the review petitions.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the review petitioners are entitled to withdraw their review petitions? (Question of procedure) The assessee (review petitioners) sought permission to withdraw the review petitions. The revenue (respondent) did not record any specific arguments against the withdrawal. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from either side regarding the merits of the original appeals or the grounds for review, as the matter was decided on the withdrawal of the petitions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT [ RP 218/2019 ,RP.210/2019 ,RP.217/2019 ,RP.245/2019 ] K.Vinod Chandran, J The learned Counsel appearing for the review petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the review petitions. Permission granted. Review petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE ASHOK MENON JUDGE jma APPENDIX OF RP 218/2019 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.9.2018 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN ITA NO. 140/2011. ANNEXURE B AOF THE CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER OF ASSESSMENT DATED 31.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA. APPENDIX OF RP 210/2019 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-A THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.09.2018 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN ITA NO.136/2011 APPENDIX OF RP 245/2019 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A THEOF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.9.2018 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN ITA NO. 147/2011. ANNEXURE B AOF THE CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER OF ASSESSMENT DATED 16.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA. ANNEXURE C AOF THE NOTICE DATED 11.2.2019 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026