THE NAGALASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court directed the second respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), to consider and pass appropriate orders on the appeal filed by the petitioner (Exhibit P2) expeditiously, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The court further ordered that coercive proceedings based on the original assessment order shall be kept in abeyance until orders are passed on the appeal. The reasoning was that the appeal filed by the petitioner institution is liable to be considered and disposed of on merits before proceeding with the recovery of amounts. The ratio decidendi is that statutory appeals should be heard and decided before coercive recovery actions are taken, and a stay on recovery is warranted pending such disposal.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, The Nagalassery Service Co-operative Bank Ltd, is a primary credit society that received an assessment order under the Income Tax Act. Aggrieved by this order, the petitioner filed a statutory appeal (Exhibit P2) and a stay petition (Exhibit P3) before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the second respondent. Despite the pending appeal, demands were being raised based on the assessment order. The petitioner approached the High Court of Kerala seeking a direction for the disposal of their appeal and a stay on recovery proceedings.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the recovery of amounts based on the assessment order should be stayed pending the disposal of the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner? The petitioner contended that demands were being raised in terms of the assessment orders, implying a need for a stay on recovery until the appeal is decided. The revenue did not record any specific arguments in the judgment regarding this issue. The court's consideration was primarily on the procedural aspect of ensuring the appeal is heard and decided.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT Petitioner is a primary credit society which has been issued with assessment order under the Income Tax Act. Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the petitioner has preferred statutory appeal, Exhibit P2, before the 2nd respondent appellate authority under the Income Tax Act. The petitioner has also preferred Exhibit P3 stay petition in the appeal. However, it is contended that demands are being raised in terms of the assessment orders.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents, I am of the opinion that the appeal preferred by the petitioner institution is liable to be considered and disposed of on merits before proceeding with the recovery of amounts in terms of the orders passed by the assessment authority. In the above view of the matter, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent appellate authority to take up consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit P2 appeal preferred by the petitioner and to dispose of the same in accordance with law at the earliest, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till orders are passed on the appeal, as directed above, coercive proceedings on the basis of the original order shall be kept in abeyance. Writ petition is ordered accordingly. ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE vgs10/5
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Salman vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 26 Oct 2026
