THE THACHAMPARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeal preferred by the petitioner institution is liable to be considered and disposed of on merits before proceeding with the recovery of amounts in terms of the orders passed by the assessment authority. Consequently, the Court directed the second respondent, the appellate authority, to take up, consider, and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's appeal (Exhibit P2) at the earliest, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Until the appeal is disposed of, coercive proceedings based on the original assessment order are to be kept in abeyance. The Court did not decide on the merits of the assessment order itself, focusing solely on the procedural aspect of appeal disposal before recovery.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, The Thachampara Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., is a primary credit society that received an assessment order under the Income Tax Act. Aggrieved by this order, the petitioner filed a statutory appeal (Exhibit P2) and a stay petition (Exhibit P3) before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the second respondent. Despite the pending appeal, demands were being raised based on the assessment order. The petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala seeking a direction to dispose of the appeal before recovery proceedings are initiated.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appellate authority should be directed to consider and dispose of the statutory appeal preferred by the petitioner before coercive recovery proceedings are initiated based on the assessment order? Assessee's contention: The petitioner argued that demands were being raised in terms of the assessment orders despite the pendency of their statutory appeal and stay petition. They sought a direction for the disposal of the appeal before any recovery action. Revenue's contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the revenue. However, the presence of the Standing Counsel suggests they were represented and likely defended the assessment order and the recovery process.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner is a primary credit society which has been issued with assessment order under the Income Tax Act. Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the petitioner has preferred statutory appeal, Exhibit P2, before the 2nd respondent appellate authority under the Income Tax Act. The petitioner has also preferred Exhibit P3 stay petition in the appeal. However, it is contended that demands are being raised in terms of the assessment orders. 2.Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents, I am of the opinion that the appeal preferred by the petitioner institution is liable to be considered and disposed of on merits before proceeding with the recovery of amounts in terms of the orders passed by the assessment authority. 3.In the above view of the matter, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent appellate authority to take up consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit P2 appeal preferred by the petitioner and to dispose of the same in accordance with law at the earliest, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till orders are passed on the appeal, as directed above, coercive proceedings on the basis of the original order shall be kept in abeyance.
Writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Anu Sivaraman, Judge sj
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026