THE MAYYANAD REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs. THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE AUTHORITY
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court directed the Appellate Authority to dispose of the stay application within four weeks. Until the stay application is disposed of, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order for the year 2016-2017 shall be kept in abeyance. Furthermore, there shall be a direction not to effect recovery for the assessment year 2014-2015 until the stay application is disposed of. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. The court did not decide on the merits of the appeals themselves, but rather on the procedural aspect of recovery pending adjudication of stay applications.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, The Mayyanad Regional Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed an Income Tax Appeal for assessment years 2014-2015 and 2016-2017. A previous writ petition (W.P.(C) No.9449/2019) resulted in a direction for the Appellate Authority to consider the stay application concerning the assessment order for 2016-2017 and to refrain from recovery steps until disposal. Subsequently, the petitioner received a recovery notice (Ext.P3) for both assessment years 2014-2015 and 2016-2017. This writ petition challenges the said recovery notice.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the recovery notice issued for assessment years 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 is valid in light of the pending appeals and stay applications before the Appellate Authority? (Question of law and fact) Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that the recovery notice is premature and contrary to the spirit of the pending appeals and the previous court directions. They relied on the principle that recovery should not be pursued while a stay application is under consideration. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions from the revenue regarding this issue.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner filed an Income Tax Appeal as against the assessment years 2014-2015 and 2016- 2017. This Court directed the Appellate Authority to consider the stay application as against the assessment order for the year 2016- 2017 as per the judgment in W.P.(C) No.9449/2019. There was also a direction not to take recovery steps till the stay application is disposed of. In the meanwhile, the petitioner has been served with Ext.P3 recovery notice for the assessment years 2014-2015 and 2016-2017. The said notice is under challenge in this writ petition. In the light of the fact that the petitioner has filed an appeal as per Ext.P1 for the assessment year 2014-2015, there shall be a direction to the Apellate Authority to dispose the stay application within four weeks. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order for the year 2016-2017 shall be kept in abeyance. There shall also be a direction
WP(C).No.17422/2019 3 not to effect recovery for the assessment year 2014-2015 till the stay application is disposed of. The stay application shall be disposed within four weeks. The writ petition is disposed of as above. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE ln
WP(C).No.17422/2019 4
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- Korba Steel Castings vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 29 Oct 2026