MINI MUTHOOTTU NIDHI KERALA LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE I
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the petitioner, on instructions, had already availed the remedy of appeal against the order dated 24.5.2019. Consequently, the Court decided to close the writ petition, leaving open all contentions available to the petitioner in the pending appeal. The Court did not delve into the merits of the case or the validity of the order dated 24.5.2019. The principle established is that a writ petition may be closed when an alternative statutory remedy has been pursued, without prejudice to the rights and contentions in that remedy. No specific amount in dispute was mentioned.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Mini Muthoottu Nidhi Kerala Ltd., formerly Mini Muthoot Mutual Funds Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The petition was filed against the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle I, Ernakulam, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-III, and the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central). The petitioner sought to challenge an order dated 24.5.2019. The Managing Director of the petitioner company represented it. The case was heard on 10.07.2019.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to maintain a writ petition before the High Court when an alternative remedy of appeal has already been availed against the impugned order dated 24.5.2019? (Question of law and fact) Assessee's Contention: The petitioner, on instructions, stated that they have already availed the remedy of appeal against the order dated 24.5.2019. No specific arguments were recorded for the petitioner beyond this statement. Revenue's Contention: No specific arguments were recorded for the revenue.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions and particularly, keeping in view that the petitioner has already availed the remedy of appeal against the order dated 24.5.2019. Statement placed on record. By leaving open all contentions available in this behalf, the writ petition is closed. S.V.BHATTI JUDGE Css/
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF JUDGMENT DATED 14.11.2018 IN ITA NO. 594 OF 2009 OF THIS HONBLE COURT. EXHIBIT P2OF THE NOTICE DATED 16.4.2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3OF THE LETTER DATED 23.4.2019 ADDRESSED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4OF THE LETTER DATED 29.4.2019 ADDRESSED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5OF THE LETTER DATED 14.5.2019 ADDRESSED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P6OF THE LETTER DATED 17.5.2019 ADDRESSED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026