RAJPUTANA AGENCIES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF I. T., BOMBAY

CIVIL APPEAL No. 91/1957Supreme Court1958 INSC 8309 October 1958Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR, P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, A.K. SARKAR12 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the expression 'at the rate applicable to the total income of the company' means the rate actually applied to the company's total income for that specific year. The Court reasoned that the context of the provision, particularly the explanation of 'tax actually borne', indicates that the specific, determined rate for the taxable income is intended. Furthermore, sub-clause (b) itself requires considering rebates allowed on undistributed profits, implying that the 'rate applicable' must account for any concessions. Therefore, the rate applicable should be the rate prescribed by the Act reduced by any rebate granted. In this case, it meant the rate at which the assessee was actually assessed (sixteen pies per rupee). Consequently, the additional income-tax was correctly computed at the difference between the statutory rate of five annas per rupee and the actual rate of sixteen pies per rupee, resulting in a rate of forty-four pies per rupee. The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision.

What were the facts?

Rajputana Agencies Ltd. (the assessee), a private limited company, was assessed for the assessment year 1952-53 on a total income of Rs. 26,385. The company declared a dividend of Rs. 30,000, of which Rs. 15,159 was determined to be excess dividend. The assessee was liable to pay additional income-tax on this excess dividend. The dispute centered on the rate at which this additional tax should be computed. The assessee had been assessed at a reduced rate of sixteen pies per rupee due to the Part B States (Taxation Concession) Order, 1950. The Income-tax Officer initially computed the additional tax at forty-four pies per rupee. This was challenged through various appellate stages, culminating in a reference to the High Court, which answered the question against the assessee. The assessee then appealed to the Supreme Court.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the expression 'at the rate applicable to the total income of the company' in sub-clause (b) of clause (ii) to the second explanation to the proviso to paragraph B of Part I of the First Schedule to the Indian Finance Act, 1951, means the rate at which the company's total income is actually assessed, or the rate prescribed by the Finance Act without considering rebates allowed under the Part B States (Taxation Concession) Order, 1950. Assessee's contention: The words 'at the rate applicable to the total income of the company' refer to the rate prescribed by paragraph B of the Act (four annas per rupee), not the reduced rate at which income-tax was actually levied. Therefore, the additional income-tax should be computed at the rate of one anna per rupee. Revenue's contention: The additional income-tax should be computed at the rate at which the appellant's income was actually assessed, meaning the rebate granted under the Part B States (Taxation Concession) Order, 1950, must be taken into account in determining the rate of additional tax.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 66(1),Section 66A(2),Section 60A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Oclobtr 9. 142 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1959] Supp. RA.JPUTANA AGENCIES LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF I. T., BOMBAY (T.L. VENKATARAMAAIYAR,P. B.GAJENDRAOADKAR and A. K. SARKAR, JJ.)

Income-tax-Assessment of company-Declaration of dividend in excess of stai1.tory limit-Additional income-tax-Computaiion- " Raie applicable to the total income of the company "', Meaning of -Indian Finance Act. r95r, First Schedul• Para. B, proviso (H), explanation (ii)(b).

The assessee, a private limited company in Saurashtra, v.·as ~ssessed for the assessment year 1952-53 on a total income of Rs. 26,385. It was assessable at the rate of four annas per rupee but in view of the provisions of the Part B States (Taxation Conces- · sion) Order, 1950, it was actually assessed at the rate of sixteen pies per rupee. The assessee had declared dividend of Rs. 30.000 out of which Rs. 15,159 was found to be excess dividend. On this excess dividend the assessee was liable to pay additional income-tax and the dispute was regarding the rate at which tax was to be computed. Clause (ii) of the proviso to para. B of Part I of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1951, which applied to the case, provid

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 66(1)

All 186 judgments and leading authorities on Section 66(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →