THAYYIL BALAKRISHNAN PRADEEP vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What were the facts?
The petitioner, Thayyil Balakrishnan Pradeep, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala challenging an assessment order (Ext.P1) passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. The petitioner had filed a statutory appeal (Ext.P2) and a stay petition (Ext.P3) before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the second respondent. The petitioner's grievance was that coercive steps were being taken pursuant to the assessment order while the appeal and stay petition were pending. The writ petition sought a direction for the second respondent to pass orders on the stay application within a specified time.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court found the petitioner's request to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court directed the second respondent, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), to pass orders on the stay application (Ext.P3) within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Furthermore, the court ordered that all further proceedings pursuant to the assessment order (Ext.P1) would be kept in abeyance until such orders on the stay application were passed. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. The court did not decide the merits of the appeal or the stay petition itself, but rather directed the appellate authority to consider the stay application.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the High Court should direct the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to pass an order on the stay application filed by the petitioner within a stipulated time frame, especially when coercive steps are being pursued during the pendency of the statutory appeal. Assessee's Contention: The petitioner argued that coercive steps were being taken during the pendency of the statutory appeal and stay petition, necessitating a direction from the High Court for expeditious disposal of the stay application. The petitioner relied on the general principle that statutory remedies should not be rendered nugatory by the delay in their disposal or by immediate coercive action. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions from the revenue. However, the court heard the learned counsel on either side, implying the revenue was represented.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 15TH VAISAKHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 15152 OF 2023 PETITIONER: THAYYIL BALAKRISHNAN PRADEEP AGED 56 YEARS AGED 56, S/O. BALAKRISHNAN, THAYYIL HOUSE, KANIMANGALAM, PALISSERI, THRISSUR, PIN - 680027 BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON MEERA V.MENON R.SREEJITH K.KRISHNA PARVATHY MENON RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680001 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOEM TAX (APPEALS) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682036 SR.GP.JOBY JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 15152 OF 2023 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner, challenging Ext.P1 assessment order has filed Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition before the 2nd respondent contending that coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order is being taken during the pendency of the statutory appeal and the stay petition, this writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to pas
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
