THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. SOCIETY FOR RURAL IMPROVEMENT

ITA/165/2016HC KeralaKLHC01026964201619 December 2016Author: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC6 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The Revenue has filed an appeal before the High Court of Kerala against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin Bench, for the assessment year 2011-2012. The assessee, Society for Rural Improvement, is a charitable trust that advances loans to poor women. The Assessing Officer considered this activity to fall under the fourth limb of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, i.e., advancement of any other object of general public utility. However, both the First Appellate Authority and the ITAT held that the activity falls under the first limb of Section 2(15), which is relief to the poor.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the activity of the assessee, which involves advancing loans to poor women from villages, clearly qualifies as 'relief to the poor' and falls within the first limb of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The Court reasoned that the provision explicitly incorporates 'relief of the poor' as a charitable activity. Therefore, the finding of the Tribunal, which confirmed the order of the First Appellate Authority, was not illegal. The Court was not satisfied that any question of law arose from the impugned order for consideration. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. No issue was expressly left undecided.

What were the issues?

The High Court had to decide the following questions of law: 1. Whether the ITAT was correct in holding that the respondent trust is entitled to be treated as a charitable institution within the meaning of the 1st limb of the definition of 'charitable purpose' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. 2. Whether the ITAT should have held that the microfinance business carried on by the respondent falls within the ambit of 'any other object of general public utility', the 4th limb in the definition of charitable purpose in Section 2(15). 3. Whether the ITAT erred in its finding that microfinance activity is not money lending as commercially understood, especially when loans are made available at exorbitant interest rates similar to private money lenders and yield high margins of profit. The Revenue argued that the activity of advancing loans by the trust constitutes a business and therefore falls under the fourth limb of Section 2(15), especially considering the potential for profit. The assessee's contentions are not explicitly recorded in the judgment, but their position, as upheld by the ITAT, was that the activity constituted 'relief to the poor'.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(15)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/28TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938 ITA.No. 165 of 2016 -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 329/2014 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 01-06-2016 APPELLANT/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) 2ND FLOOR, SAN JUAN TOWER, KOCHI 682 018. BY ADVS.SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEP SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: ----------------------------------------- SOCIETY FOR RURAL IMPROVEMENT, KOLLENGODE, PALAKKAD. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ITA.No. 165 of 2016 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28-11-2013. ANNEUXRE B: TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 19-2-2014 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) II, KOCHI.

PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL O

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 2(15)

All 2,855 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(15) →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →