SHRI SREEDHAR ASOK KUMAR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/251/2015HC KeralaKLHC01025652201511 December 2017Author: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON9 pages

AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

This appeal by the assessee, Sreedhar Asok Kumar, proprietor of Indian Institute of Management, is against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin Bench, dated May 7, 2015. The ITAT's order was in appeal ITA 18/COCH/2012. The Revenue is the respondent. The specific assessment year(s) and the amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The procedural history indicates that the ITAT's order is the subject of challenge before the High Court.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the Tribunal had erred in its conclusion. The Court found that the Indian Institute of Management was indeed an educational institution existing solely for educational purposes and not for profit. Consequently, its income was eligible for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The reasoning likely involved an analysis of the institution's objectives, activities, and financial structure to ascertain if it met the criteria for an educational institution not run for profit. The ratio decidendi is that an institution primarily engaged in imparting education, without a profit motive, qualifies for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad), irrespective of any surplus generated, as long as it is applied for the objects of the institution. The operative direction would be to grant the exemption.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the income from the Indian Institute of Management is taxable as income from business, and not as income from an educational institution, thereby denying the benefit of Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that the Indian Institute of Management is an educational institution existing solely for educational purposes and not for the purpose of profit. Therefore, its income should be exempt under Section 10(23C)(iiiad). The assessee likely relied on the nature of its activities and its objective of imparting education. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue contended that the institution was run for profit, and thus, the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) was not applicable. The Revenue likely presented evidence or arguments to demonstrate the profit-making motive or the distribution of profits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

10(23C)(iiiad)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1939 -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 18/COCH/2012 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 07-05-2015 APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT/ASSESSEE: -------------------------------- SREEDHAR ASOK KUMAR PROPRIETOR, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, AISWARYA BUILDINGS, VALANJAMBALAM,KOCHI 682 016

BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT/REVENUE: -------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R BUILDING,I.S PRESS ROAD,COCHIN 682 018

R BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

--------------------

Appendix — schedule of exhibits

APPENDIX --------- APPELLANT(S) ANNEXURES: ---------------------- ANNEXURE A: COPY OF ASSESSMENT DATED 30-12-2010 PASSED U/S.143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIO

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free account Sign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →