M/S.PANKAJA KASTURI HERBALS INDIA PVT. LTD., vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala, in these writ petitions, has followed the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court in M/s Jain Metal Rolling Mills v. Union of India. Consequently, the Court has read down Section 245C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by removing the retrospective last date of February 1, 2021, and substituting it with March 31, 2021. This amendment also impacts the eligibility date mentioned in the impugned circular dated September 28, 2021, which is now also to be considered as March 31, 2021. All applications, including those arising between February 1, 2021, and March 31, 2021, are to be deemed pending applications for consideration by the Interim Board. Orders rejecting applications solely on the ground that they did not have a case pending as on January 31, 2021, are set aside. Such applications are to be deemed pending and dealt with on merits in accordance with law. The impugned orders are set aside, and the cases are remitted back to the competent respondent for fresh decisions.
What were the facts?
These writ petitions were filed by M/s. Pankaja Kasturi Herbals India Pvt. Ltd. and Hailstone Innovations Pvt. Ltd., along with their Managing Directors, challenging various orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. The petitioners are aggrieved by the rejection of their applications for settlement before the Interim Board for Settlement. The core of the dispute revolves around the interpretation of the amended Section 245C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the eligibility criteria for settlement applications, particularly concerning the retrospective date stipulated for pending cases. The petitioners contend that the amended provisions and related circulars unfairly exclude them from the settlement scheme.
What were the issues?
1. Whether Section 245C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended by the Finance Act, 2021, which introduced a retrospective cut-off date of February 1, 2021, for pending cases eligible for settlement, is valid and applicable to the petitioners' applications. Assessee's contention: The petitioners argue that the retrospective application of the cut-off date is arbitrary and excludes genuine cases that should be eligible for settlement. They rely on the principle that beneficial provisions should be interpreted liberally. Revenue's contention: The revenue likely defends the validity and applicability of the amended Section 245C(5) and the circulars issued thereunder, asserting that the legislature intended to set a specific period for settlement applications.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
245C(5)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 28785 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: 1 M/S.PANKAJA KASTURI HERBALS INDIA PVT. LTD., KASTURI, POOVACHAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR. J.HAREENDRAN NAIR, PIN - 695575 2 DR.J.HAREENDRAN NAIR, AGED 60 YEARS KASTURI, POOVACHAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695575 BY ADVS. ANIL D. NAIR TELMA RAJU AADITYA NAIR RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695003 2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695003 BY ADVS. NAVANEETH.N.NATH, CGC SUSIE B VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.12.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).26130/2023, 30919/2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 26130 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S:
HAILSTONE INNOVATIONS PVT. LTD, DOOR NO. 4/381 B, AYYANKUNNU PO, MUNDUR, THRISSUR, KERALA-680541, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTED MR. R.J. WILLIAMS. 2 R.J. WILLIAMS, VELLOTTINGAL HOUSE, ANTONY ROAD, OLLUR, THRISSUR, KERALA, PIN - 680306 BY ADVS. ANIL D. NAIR TELMA RAJU AADITYA NAIR RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1,KANDOMKULATHY TOWERS INCOME TAX OFFICE OPPOSITE MAHARAJAS COLLEGE GROUND,KOCHI, PIN - 682001 2 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001 3 INTERIM BOARD FOR SETTLEMENT, IBS-2, LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 30919 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S:
HAILSTONE INNOVATIONS PVT. LTD. , DOOR NO. 4/381 B, AYYANKUNNU PO MUNDUR, THRISSUR, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTED MR. R.J. WILLIAMS, PIN - 680541 2 R.J. WILLIAMS, VELLOTTINGAL HOUSE, ANTONY ROAD, OLLUR, THRISSUR, KERALA, PIN - 680306 BY ADVS. ANIL D. NAIR TELMA RAJU AADITYA NAIR RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1,KANDOMKULATHY TOWERS INCOME TAX OFFICE,OPPOSITE MAHARAJAS COLLEGE GROUND KOCHI, PIN - 682001 2 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY ,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE,NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001 3 INTERIM BOARD FOR SETTLEMENT, IBS-2, LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003 BY ADV NAVANEETH.N.NATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 25867 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: M/S. PANKAJA KASTURI HERBALS INDIA PVT. LTD., KASTURI, POOVACHAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 575, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR. J HAREENDRAN NAIR BY ADVS. ANIL D. NAIR TELMA RAJU AADITYA NAIR RESPONDENT/S: 1 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695003 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695003 3 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001 4 INTERIM BOARD FOR SETTLEMENT, IBS-2, LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003 BY ADV JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Dated this the 19th day of December, 2023 The present writ petitions have been filed, questioning Ext.P8 order in W.P(C) No. 25867 of 2023, Ext.P10 order in W.P(C) Nos. 26130 of 2023 & 30919 of 2013 and Exts.P39 to P45 in W.P(C) No. 28785 of 2023. The issue is covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of Madras High Court dated 17.11.2023 in W.P(C) No. 13455 of 2021 and connected cases in M/s Jain Metal Rolling Mills v. Union of India [MANU/TN/6417/2023]
The learned Division Bench of the Madras High Court had disposed of the batch of these writ petition in following terms which are mentioned in Paragraph 42 is extracted as under:- “42.In the result, these writ petitions are partly allowed and are disposed off on the following terms :~ (i) Section 245C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2021) is read down by removing the retrospective last date of 1st date of February, 2021 as 31st day of March, 2021; (ii) Consequently the last date of eligibility mentioned paragraph 4(i) of the impugned circular dated 28.09.2021 shall also be read as 31.03.2021; (iii) all the applications in respect of the petitioners even in respect of the cases arising between 01.02.2021 to 31.03.2021 shall be deemed be pending applications and shall be deemed to be pending applications for the purposes of consideration by the Interim Board; (iv) Wherever they are rejected on the ground that they did not have a case pending as on 31.01.2021, such orders shall stand set aside and the applications shall be deemed to be pending applications for the consideration by the Interim Board, if otherwise in order and eligible, and shall be dealt with in accordance with law on merits in accordance with the scheme that may be framed by the Central Government as in respect of the other cases which arose prior to 31.01.2021; (v) No Costs. Consequently all miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.” As the issue is covered by the judgment of the learned Division Bench of the Madras High Court, in the judgment, M/s Jain Metal Rolling Mills (supra), the present writ petitions are allowed and the aforesaid impugned orders are set aside. The cases are remitted back to the competent respondent for taking fresh decision on the applications in the light of the judgment as aforementioned. DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE SJ
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026