P.M NOUSHAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the petitioner's request for permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C. with the liberty to file a fresh one. The court's reasoning was based on the counsel's submission seeking this permission. Consequently, the Crl.M.C. was dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition being expressly reserved. No decision was made on the merits of the original case.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, P.M. Noushad, filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Case (Crl.M.C.) before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam. This case was filed against an order dated in CC No. 2672 of 2018, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (E&O), Ernakulam. The respondent in this case is the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Ernakulam. The Crl.M.C. was listed for admission on February 29, 2024. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C. with liberty to file a fresh one.
What were the issues?
The primary issue before the High Court was whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the Crl.M.C. with liberty to file a fresh petition. The petitioner's counsel argued for permission to withdraw the case and refile it later. The respondent, the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, did not record any specific arguments in the judgment. The court had to decide whether to allow the withdrawal with the requested liberty.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Crl.M.C. with liberty to file a fresh one. Permission is granted. Reserving the aforesaid liberty of the petitioner, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJM
CRL.MC NO. 10819 OF 2023 3 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 10819/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure AOF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 31.01.2017 BY THE RESPOONDENT Annexure BOF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE RETURN FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR AY 2011-12 DATED 29.03.2017 Annexure COF THE REPLY FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 28.06.2017 Annexure DOF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT FOR AY 2011-12 DATED 29.12.2017 Annexure EOF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ISSUED
BY THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX UNDER SECTION 279(1) OF THE ACT DATED 06.11.2017 Annexure FOF THE REPLY FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29.11.2017 AGAINST ANNEXURE-F NOTICE Annexure GOF SANCTION ORDER ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL COMMSSIONER OF INCOME TAX UNDER SECTION 279(1) OF THE ACT DATED 08.01.2018 Annexure H AOF THE MEMORANDUM IN C.C.NO.2672/2018
BEFORE
THE JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT (ECONOMIC OFFENCES)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026