COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX vs. BERI SHALINI TRUST

PDF · subscribers
WTR/215/1996HC GujaratGJHC24022145199629 January 1998Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court answered the question referred to it in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reasoning provided is that the facts and the question involved are almost identical to those in Wealth Tax Reference No. 43/93, which was decided by the same bench on the same day. For the reasons given in that prior judgment, the High Court found the ITAT's direction to levy tax at the normal rate to be correct. The ratio decidendi is that when facts and issues are identical to a previously decided case by the same court, the same decision will be applied. The operative direction is that the reference stands disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.

What were the facts?

This case involves a reference made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad, to the High Court of Gujarat concerning the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax is the petitioner, and Beri Shalini Trust is the respondent assessee. The High Court notes that the facts and the question involved are similar to another case, Wealth Tax Reference No. 43/93, decided on the same day. Therefore, the court did not deem it necessary to reproduce the specific facts of this particular case. The procedural history leading to the reference involves the ITAT's decision, which is now under challenge.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the Assessing Officer to levy the tax on the assessee trust at the normal rate? The Revenue's contention, implied by the reference of this question, is that the ITAT erred in directing the levy of wealth tax at the normal rate. The Revenue likely argued that a different rate or treatment was applicable. The Assessee's contention, inferred from the High Court's decision, is that the normal rate of wealth tax is indeed the correct rate to be applied to the trust. The judgment does not explicitly detail the arguments of either party beyond the framing of the question and the court's reference to a prior similar case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 27

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No 215 of 1996

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.

Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus BERI SHALINI TRUST

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: B.B.NAYAK with MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner Respondent served

--------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 29/01/98

ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K.Abichandani,J.)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad has referred for the opinion of this Court the following question under Section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. "Whether the appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the Assessing Officer to levy the tax on the assessee trust at the normal rate?"

A similar question has been answered by us today in Wealth Tax Reference No. 43/93. Since the facts are similar and the question involved almost identical, we do not find it necessary to reproduce the facts of this case. For the reasons given by us in our judgement and order delivered in Wealth Tax Reference No. 43/93 today, we answer the question referred to us in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ------

*/Mohandas

More judgments on Section 27

All 110 judgments and leading authorities on Section 27 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →