C.I.T.PATIALA vs. M/S METALWAYS(P)LTD.CHD.

ITR/20/1990HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01021570199028 February 2007Author: MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR,MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in its order dated February 28, 2007, disposed of the reference. The Court stated that in view of a separate order passed on the same day in I.T.R. Nos. 336 & 337 of 1996 (also involving the Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala v. M/s Metalways (P) Ltd., Chandigarh), the question of law referred to it was answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. The judgment does not provide the reasoning or the ratio decidendi for this specific reference, but it indicates that the outcome was determined by a related decision. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision allowing the deduction under Section 80J was upheld, and the reference was disposed of accordingly. No issue was expressly left undecided.

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala (the revenue) has filed a reference application before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (the Tribunal). The assessee is M/s Metalways (P) Ltd., Chandigarh. The assessment year in question is 1982-83. The dispute pertains to the allowance of deduction under Section 80J of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal had allowed the deduction, relying on its previous decision for assessment year 1979-80, against which a reference application had already been allowed by the High Court. The revenue's contention is that the assessee was not entitled to the deduction as the five-year period stipulated in Section 80J(2) had expired.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in allowing deduction u/s 80J for assessment year 1982-83, despite the fact that the period of five years for which deduction is allowable as laid down by sub-section (2) of section 80J had already expired? Assessee's Contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee. However, the Tribunal's decision, which is under challenge, allowed the deduction. The assessee would have likely argued that the deduction was admissible based on the Tribunal's prior ruling and potentially other grounds not detailed in this excerpt. Revenue's Contentions: The revenue contended that the assessee was not entitled to the deduction under Section 80J for assessment year 1982-83 because the five-year period for which the deduction is allowable, as stipulated by Section 80J(2), had already expired. The revenue relied on the fact that the High Court had previously allowed a reference application against the Tribunal's decision for assessment year 1979-80, implying a precedent against the assessee's claim.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80J

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

I.T.R. No.20 of 1990 Date of Decision:28.02.2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala .....Petitioner Vs. M/s Metalways (P) Ltd., Chandigarh .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate for the revenue. Mr. S.K.Mukhi, Advocate for the assessee. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. Following question of law arising out of order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short, `the Tribunal') in I.T.A. No.1069 of 1985 dated 7.3.1989, in respect of assessment year 1982-83 has been referred for opinion of this Court :- “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in allowing deduction u/s 80J (relying upon its decision for the asstt. Year 1979-80 against which a reference application has since been allowed by the Hon'ble Pb. and Haryana High Court vide its order dated 25.8.1983), though the assessee was not entitled to deduction u/s 80J for the assessment year 1982-83 in view of the fact t

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 80J

All 76 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80J →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →