COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. PARSHURAM POTTERY WORKS CO LTD

ITR/329/1984HC GujaratGJHC24011994198420 August 1999Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.C.PATEL,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.C.PATEL2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income-tax (Revenue) has referred two questions of law to the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad for its opinion. These questions arise from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench "A". The assessee is Parshuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. The dispute concerns the allowability of expenses incurred by the assessee for maintaining guest houses at Morvi, Wankaner, Thangadh, and Bombay. The assessment year(s) are not explicitly stated. The procedural history indicates that similar questions for the same assessee were previously referred to the High Court in Income Tax Reference Nos. 90 of 1983 and 418 of 1983, and the Division Bench declined to answer them.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Gujarat, per M.C. Patel, J., declined to answer the questions referred by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the revenue. The Court cited two previous decisions of a Division Bench (Rajesh Balia and M.S. Shah, JJ.) in Income Tax Reference No. 90 of 1983 and Reference No. 418 of 1983, concerning the same assessee and identical questions. For the reasons stated in those earlier decisions, the Court found it appropriate to decline answering the present reference. The specific reasoning from the prior judgments is not detailed in this excerpt, nor is there any finding on the merits of the allowability of the guest house expenses or the significance of the absence of a register. The operative direction is to decline answering the reference.

What were the issues?

The Tribunal had to decide the following questions of law: 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in concluding that the expenses incurred by the assessee for maintaining guest houses at Morvi, Wankaner, Thangadh, and Bombay were allowable under Section 37(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in concluding that the expenses of guest houses at Morvi, Wankaner, Thangadh, and Bombay could be allowed under Section 37(4) of the Act notwithstanding the fact that no register was maintained? The Revenue contended that the Tribunal erred in allowing these expenses. The Assessee's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The judgment does not mention any specific authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon by either party.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 37(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 329 of 1984

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL AND MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution

of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be cirNos. 1 to 5 NOculated to the Civil Judge? :

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 37(4)

All 28 judgments and leading authorities on Section 37(4) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →