COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S P JAIN & COMPANY

ITR/200/1995HC GujaratGJHC24022523199507 November 2001Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT S. SHAH,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Allied Motors (P.) Ltd. vs. C.I.T., 224 I.T.R. 677, answered the question in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The reasoning is that the Supreme Court's decision in Allied Motors clarified the application of Section 43B concerning the deductibility of statutory liabilities like sales tax. The ratio decidendi is that if a statutory liability is paid within the due date of filing the return of income for the relevant assessment year, it is allowable as a deduction in that year, even if it pertains to a prior period. The operative direction was to answer the reference in favour of the assessee.

What were the facts?

This case involves an Income Tax Reference filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) against the assessee, S P Jain & Company, for the assessment year 1984-85. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had confirmed an order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal). The core of the dispute was the deletion of an addition of unpaid sales tax liability amounting to Rs. 97,536, which the revenue sought to include by invoking Section 43B of the Income Tax Act. The High Court heard the revenue's counsel, while the assessee remained unrepresented despite being served.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in confirming the order made by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal) deleting the addition of unpaid sales tax liability of Rs. 97,536 invoking the provisions of section 43B? The revenue's contention, as presented by its counsel, was that the ITAT erred in confirming the deletion of the unpaid sales tax liability. The revenue sought to invoke Section 43B of the Income Tax Act to disallow the deduction of this liability. The assessee's contentions were not recorded as they did not appear before the court. The revenue relied on the provisions of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 43B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 200 of 1995

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 43B

All 7,161 judgments and leading authorities on Section 43B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →