COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. YUDHISTHAR INVESTMENT PVT LTD

ITR/226/1991HC GujaratGJHC24013459199125 June 2003Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

This case involves an Income Tax Reference filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) against the assessee, Yudhistar Investment Pvt Ltd. The reference arises from an order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench-A. The core issue revolves around interest charged under Section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The material fact, as submitted by both parties, is that the assessee neither paid the interest amount to its creditors nor credited their accounts with this interest during the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the assessee contended there was no liability to deduct tax on this interest under Section 194A(1) of the Act.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court, in respectful agreement with a previous judgment delivered in I.T.R. No. 223/1991, decided the question referred to it in the affirmative, meaning in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The reasoning was based on the undisputed fact that the assessee had neither paid the interest to its creditors nor credited their accounts. The Court held that in such a scenario, there was no liability on the part of the assessee to deduct tax on the said amount of interest under Section 194A(1) of the Act. Consequently, the interest charged under Section 201(1A) was rightly cancelled by the Tribunal. The ratio decidendi is that interest under Section 201(1A) is consequential to a failure to deduct tax at source, and if there is no obligation to deduct tax under Section 194A(1) due to non-payment or non-crediting of interest, then Section 201(1A) cannot be invoked. The Reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, as a matter of law and fact, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in cancelling the interest charged under Section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961? Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that since the interest payable to creditors was neither paid nor credited to their accounts, there was no obligation to deduct tax at source on such interest as per Section 194A(1) of the Act. Therefore, the consequential interest under Section 201(1A) should not have been levied. Revenue's Contention: The revenue, through its learned Standing Counsel, sought to challenge the Tribunal's order cancelling the interest charged under Section 201(1A). The specific grounds for this challenge were not detailed in the judgment, but the reference itself indicates the revenue's disagreement with the Tribunal's decision.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 201(1A),Section 256(1),Section 194A(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 226 of 1991

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Ma

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 201(1A)

All 4,608 judgments and leading authorities on Section 201(1A) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →