MADHUR VEGOLIS PVT LTD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/57/2018HC RajasthanRJHC02036954201822 January 2019Author: MOHAMMAD RAFIQ,GOVERDHAN BARDHAR2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The assessee, Madhur Vegoils Private Limited, filed an appeal before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, challenging a judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jaipur Bench, dated 31.07.2017. The ITAT's order had set aside an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) and remanded the matter back to the AO for de novo assessment. During the pendency of the appeal before the High Court, the assessee produced a copy of a fresh assessment order dated 28.12.2018, which was passed pursuant to the ITAT's remand directions. The High Court noted that the assessee had participated in the proceedings before the AO.

Held

The High Court held that it would not be appropriate to decide the present appeal on merits. This was because a fresh assessment order had been passed on 28.12.2018, in terms of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court noted that the assessee had the opportunity to participate in the proceedings before the Assessing Officer and present its case. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as having become infructuous. The appellant was, however, granted liberty to appeal against the fresh assessment order and challenge it on all available legal grounds.

Key Issues

1. Whether, under the garb of rejection of books of accounts, huge trading additions can be legally justifiable when the defects pointed out, if any, were minor defects and no defect was pointed out in the opening stock, purchases, sales, closing stock, and stock-register? (Question of law/mixed law and fact). Assessee's contention: The assessee argued that the defects in the books of accounts were minor and that crucial elements like opening stock, purchases, sales, closing stock, and stock-register were not found to be defective. Therefore, substantial trading additions based on the rejection of books were not legally justifiable. Revenue's contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the revenue regarding this issue.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 57/2018 Madhur Vegoils Private Limited Having Its Registered Address At 8-C, Small Scale Industrial Area, Kota Through Its Director shri Kotu Mal Advani, S/o Shri Bansha Mal Advani ----Assessee-Appellant Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Kota Having Its Address, At Central Revenue Building Near C.A.D. Circle, Kota ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharh Ranka For Respondent(s) : Ms. Parnitoo Jain with Ms. Shiva Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

Judgment 22/01/2019 By this appeal, appellant seeks to question the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur dated 31.07.2017, that was admitted by the Court on 21.02.2018 on the following questions: “Whether under the garb of rejection of books of accounts, huge trading additions can said to be legally justifiable when the defects pointed out, if any, were minor defects and no defect was pointed out in the opening stock, purchases, sales, closing stock and stock- register”

Mr. Siddharth Ranka, learned counsel for the appellant has argued at some length and also cited a n

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →