PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S RAMBHAJOS

ITA/72/2019HC RajasthanRJHC02052660201904 September 2019Author: MOHAMMAD RAFIQ,NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

These are two connected Income Tax Appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central, Jaipur, against M/s Rambhajos and Dinesh Kumar Agarwal. The appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench. The appellant's counsel placed before the Court instructions dated August 8, 2019, issued in furtherance of CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018. These instructions specified enhanced monetary limits for filing income tax appeals. The monetary limit for appeals before the High Court was set at Rs. 1,00,00,000. The appellant's counsel submitted that the monetary limit in the present appeals was less than the prescribed amount.

Held

The High Court dismissed the present appeals. The decision was based on the instructions dated August 8, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), which enhanced the monetary limits for filing income tax appeals. The instructions stipulated that appeals before the High Court should have a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000. Since the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the monetary limit in these appeals was less than the prescribed amount, the Court found the appeals to be not maintainable under the revised guidelines. The ratio decidendi is that appeals filed by the Department that do not meet the enhanced monetary thresholds specified by the CBDT are liable to be dismissed. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeals.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeals are maintainable before the High Court given the enhanced monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department? The appellant contended that the monetary limit in the present appeals is less than the prescribed amount as per the instructions dated August 8, 2019, issued in furtherance of CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018. The revenue did not present any arguments as the matter was decided based on the appellant's submission regarding the monetary limits.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR (1) D. B. Income Tax Appeal No. 72/2019 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, New Central Revenue Building (Extension Building), Near Statue Circle, Janpath, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus M/s Rambhajos, 397, First Floor, Ram Bhawan, Hanumanji Ka Rasta, Jaipur. ----Respondent Connected With (2) D. B. Income Tax Appeal No. 352/2018 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Central, New Central Revenue Building Statue Circle Jaipur (Raj) ----Appellant Versus Dinesh Kumar Agarwal, 867 Ganga Mata Ki Gali Gopal Ji Ka Rasta Johari Bazar Jaipur ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna on behalf of Mr. Anil Mehta. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 04/09/2019 Learned counsel for the appellant has placed before this Court a copy of the instructions dated 08th August, 2019, issued in furtherance of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (the Board) and its amendment dated 20th August, 2018 vide which monetary limits for filing of (2 of 2) [ITA-72/2019] income tax appeals by the Departmen

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →