ASHOK PARWAL (AY 2014-15) S/O SHRI RADHEY SHYAM PARWAL vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

CW/946/2026HC RajasthanRJHC02002796202616 July 2026Author: ARUN MONGA,MANEESH SHARMA2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Ashok Parwal, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a show cause notice dated 06.02.2025 and a consequential order dated 21.11.2025, both issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Jaipur, under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessment year in question is 2014-15. Both the petitioner and the respondent agreed that the matter involved a similar controversy to one already disposed of by the High Court on 09.03.2026 in D.B. CWP No.1486/2026. This prior order was based on an interim order from the Hon'ble Apex Court in Siddharth Totuka Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle, SLP No. 31711/2025, which had stayed proceedings concerning Section 153C.

Held

The Tribunal held that since the Hon'ble Apex Court was directly adjudicating the narrow compass of the issue concerning Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it would be appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition by extending the same protection as granted by the Hon'ble Apex Court. The Tribunal directed that the Adjudicating Authority shall not proceed with any proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the petitioner, nor give effect to any consequential orders, for as long as the interim protection granted by the Hon'ble Apex Court continues to operate. The outcome of SLP No. 31711/2025 (tagged with SLP(C) No. 33392/2025) shall govern the outcome of the present petition. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Key Issues

1. Whether the proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority, insofar as they pertain to Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, including the impugned order, should be stayed in light of the interim protection granted by the Hon'ble Apex Court in a related matter. Assessee's Contention: The petitioner argued that the controversy in the present matter is under consideration before the Hon'ble Apex Court in Siddharth Totuka Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle, SLP No. 31711/2025. They relied on the Apex Court's order dated 08.12.2025, which stayed proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority concerning Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner prayed for similar protection and submitted that the outcome of their petition should be governed by the outcome of the said SLP. Revenue's Contention: The respondent fairly submitted that the order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court shall be duly followed and that the petition, if disposed of, should be made subject to the final outcome of the aforesaid SLP.

Sections Cited

Section 153C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[2026:RJ-JP:27135-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 946/2026 URN: CW / 2172U / 2026 Ashok Parwal (AY 2014-15) S/o Shri Radhey Shyam Parwal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o M-57, Mahesh Colony, Tonk Phatak, Lal Kothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302015 ----Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, 416, 4th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, LIC Building, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vedant Agrawal (through VC) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA

Order 16/07/2026

1.

The petitioner, inter alia, seeks quashing of show cause notice dated 06.02.2025 and consequential order dated 21.11.2025 passed by Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle, Jaipur, issued under Section 153C of Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Learned counsel for both the parties are ad idem that the matter involving similar controversy has already been disposed of vide an order dated 09.03.2026 in D.B. CWP No.1486/2026 which reads as under:- "Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present matter is unde

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →