KISHAN CHAND AND CO. vs. C.I.T.

ITR/229/1995HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01032286199525 July 2019Author: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

This is a reference before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh concerning Income Tax Reference No. 229 of 1995. The appellant is Ms/ Kishan Chand and Co. Oil Industries Ltd., Ludhiana, and the respondent is the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana. The reference arises from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The specific assessment years are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The dispute involves three questions of law related to additions and deductions made by the revenue authorities and sustained or restored by the ITAT. The procedural history indicates this is a reference to the High Court after the ITAT's decision.

Held

The High Court decided the reference by disposing of the three questions of law. Regarding Question No. 2, both learned counsel agreed that it should be decided in terms of the High Court's decision dated 24.7.2019 in ITR No. 225 of 1995. The Court ordered accordingly, deciding Question No. 2 in the same terms as that prior order. For Questions No. 1 and 3, the learned counsel for the appellant conceded that these questions had already been decided by the High Court in the case of Sirsa Industries reported in 178 ITR 437 (P&H). The Court ordered that these questions be disposed of in terms of the Sirsa Industries decision. Consequently, Questions No. 1 and 3 were decided in the same terms as the decision in Sirsa Industries. The reference was disposed of in these terms. No specific amounts were deleted or added by the High Court's decision; rather, the matter was decided based on prior precedents.

Key Issues

The High Court was asked to decide three questions of law: 1. Whether the Tribunal was right in sustaining an addition of Rs. 20,701/- on account of a provision made for the shortfall of Central Sales Tax payable, in light of the judgment in 147 ITR 238, which was reserved by the High Court in 178 ITR 437. 2. Whether the Tribunal rightly relied on the Supreme Court's decision in 152 ITR 454 to restore an addition of Rs. 1,08,922/- on account of interest on Fixed Deposits (FDs) on an accrual basis. 3. Whether the Tribunal was right in restoring a deduction of Rs. 1,33,078/- claimed on interest on account of excise duty paid during the assessment year, relying on the Punjab and Haryana High Court's judgment in 178 ITR 437. Assessee's Contentions: The assessee, through its senior advocate, implicitly argued against the additions and for the deductions by filing the reference. The specific arguments are not detailed, but the questions posed indicate the assessee's challenge to the Tribunal's findings. Revenue's Contentions: The revenue, through its senior standing counsel, supported the Tribunal's decision. The specific arguments are not detailed, but the questions posed indicate the revenue's position on the additions and deductions.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 25.7.2019 Ms/ Kishan Chand and Co. Oil Industries Ltd., Ludhiana .......Appellant Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana .......Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present: - Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. ***** AJAY TEWARI

, J. (ORAL)

In this reference, the following questions of law have arisen:- "

1.

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in sustaining the addition of Rs. 20,701/- on account of provision made for the short fall of Central Sales Tax payable in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court reported in 147 ITR 238, which stands reserved by the High Court in 178 ITR 437 ?

2.

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has rightly relied upon the ratio of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 152 ITR 454 to restore the addition of Rs. 1,08,922/-

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →